From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com (mail-it0-f42.google.com [209.85.214.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0053F324B for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:04:23 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e195-v6so4558069ita.5 for ; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:04:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qwilt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Dvs6sO8g+v05ZNSPAvNCV8yrxxnAT+pItARUHoo5RUQ=; b=gzbwraY0kgaioqgadjUExhPcRbsg2MT20u+FthzEQ97ca1p0HaTZjup4lSXBOQmm7Q Ak1nUVx+rUmPkz5SdRgwLdHVcfdziKtuAqB30b0gy94CcdeB4AzpE51c9ACwYSYCNYe1 5SY51IPugZFRz2OyaecipFqXorS/wYmpHSTKWoztTXSWwIgp94jfW97+JHZWzjb3mzLs S4uxmyLj3ux2fUX2zw/ybImL0Yd39W2kPR3QVBvVVt2TeVqlbWajKgOLMeu1NF/nsoV+ SqLqT8PdEq9tM152z04GLxDqzvVkp/YqzYadJInPbfFdc8ppULFCTSPzP8j7Wca+lMcq /4Og== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Dvs6sO8g+v05ZNSPAvNCV8yrxxnAT+pItARUHoo5RUQ=; b=JBsS9ObAUJtQtDMe8WVcmJUkckfaWkmnAXnvXOlrQJ+jW9/UcpDTSqVEUX7Gh7B28N /1AVYasLYhNoBD03zmaAkfBLoSD+/9YmUxiuIOTygtbSXkz6TrcyVHBWSD19WHzyNuN4 dC5sfgWWI9S4VRmQMO2c/Las+/FI5ijStjB48/m6M5Ck2CsG5hcc5JSWPJCfs2PpqRRb 4bfuhLhTWKgJkGddMAA15NBseVP+VGXQQfyi1/jLV5s0viIkgD5rAYU1xDRrUb+Izd1W tzR436b7cnNP3X1vzLrFBoW4jghalURQ49ZBDK+D4v7J6iGpOTy2oUZqWYMYEqPNM2aC A4Dg== X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7Hpzei/kG9Qi1d7vwTi+tZxpOPUge4uZ2TQjbreAeG3WXToOfvf J5OuCurAGdWjLxMFYfjmzROjJt9kuoAimuVxVWmJzg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELvLv65afIjC2vPSGQcqpAQfxNyAQU2ivL76EGd3npHgK11lGCwFQfc56P+Z0U4665nHwzSl/UXFtkn/ipJdUTQ= X-Received: by 2002:a24:595:: with SMTP id 143-v6mr1749849itl.138.1521587063280; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:04:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.142.202 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1645860.rB6cz0fKiK@xps> References: <1521581285-4709-1-git-send-email-arnon@qwilt.com> <6503395.k68LoKUDuZ@xps> <1645860.rB6cz0fKiK@xps> From: Arnon Warshavsky Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 01:04:22 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Burakov, Anatoly" , wenzhuo.lu@intel.com, declan.doherty@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, Bruce Richardson , ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] eal: replace rte_panic instances to return an error value X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 23:04:24 -0000 > > You are talking about API, and I agree the old applications can keep > considering the functions as void. > But I was talking about ABI, meaning: can we use an old application > without recompiling and update only the DPDK (in .so file)? > > > You are right of course. Once again I mixed the two.. I will modify accordingly