From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B58A04B8; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:26:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5841D531; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:26:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-il1-f196.google.com (mail-il1-f196.google.com [209.85.166.196]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91371D15E for ; Tue, 5 May 2020 14:26:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-il1-f196.google.com with SMTP id e8so2039448ilm.7 for ; Tue, 05 May 2020 05:26:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bvpUqfs9MjRtZJ8Xh+Hk9QCZ9dXmtwEQT2jcEF4bCk8=; b=FohERGV/LLxBGr/PRxI0eGlwQkjU9s7geVRh2oeoZ09AioUOQyPS77LzTCyPWvzv7P hUGycQZJ85EWMpOHnBtXoyjGjgwGMG8TvzIDc9cApQJjPAi3sHEI69WrhueAR7Gcrvxf 1fduY9UQzigC4B9o6UsJ8wYmqvcrxSGwvCpKIZSFEe8amDwmLFfgCIOok3VELvkLbREt MS6edGHtZ48d0x89utVce7Gi5KdE0tYrccCgnKXNazdYWpYnyPUSJNRwdIo0Gf7V4cVk kydtVpBMeEKLmj85tdDorTLLR8jZVR8JQLGokQy1sv3v0DMoN8lNFUVY944LQF+UkIW0 f9nw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bvpUqfs9MjRtZJ8Xh+Hk9QCZ9dXmtwEQT2jcEF4bCk8=; b=t/QDgwk1NcHSC4dW3Ku88XLWgX/ebTRqRxMRowODpd+FMlbD+f4ogZyaKvmbow4bFw 3ngmMYrUfROK4E/ygflXYNimJBzfnQs7Oh4J8aqQTgZ2UjZFIu/ODz6w4Pacl8z57Kz4 KvUsZ2FhVyZYUTXuYYBU99ZA9QFeB1UREbK2+n9NOOXAc4T23BqfxB5YjfE3nDZBAfcL DnI3td20CXLWr8qO17gB/Q/R3gE/HcYhLJRqj/bYEt8Nz9kJmVW6879l6DYhg0pXlmU1 K+UTmly8w1Ks1JKvz65FPkxBm4hMkfUARg0bXYWlae7RMyJR8peeHOfwq8CPPzk9hCtx lS9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZdf0MD/6hhwMNVot85lIylZAxda2DoIMNodAAvt5qDV6jIrV0P eIERjvI8wEn/SEfqCh+5mKBMS6/Og38jsFKELgo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypKfy4tygi0dlWK2CzZsSIZsbSJvIObXzZP0MnbXg4+vfHyaTjoJRWPkf2FIuN0aijhNhJBDzVBEYJiLs83JI7o= X-Received: by 2002:a92:d341:: with SMTP id a1mr3470354ilh.130.1588681585952; Tue, 05 May 2020 05:26:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200503203135.6493-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <2596990.BEx9A2HvPv@thomas> <2479551.BddDVKsqQX@thomas> In-Reply-To: From: Jerin Jacob Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 17:56:09 +0530 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dpdk-dev , Jerin Jacob , Sunil Kumar Kori , John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , Declan Doherty , Ferruh Yigit , Andrew Rybchenko , Olivier Matz Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/8] trace: simplify trace point registration X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 5:06 PM David Marchand wrote: > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:13 PM Jerin Jacob wrote: > > > > Please share the data. > > > > > > Measured time between first rte_trace_point_register and last one with > > > a simple patch: > > > > I will try to reproduce this, once we finalize on the above synergy > > with rte_log. > > I took the time to provide measure but you won't take the time to look at this. I will spend time on this. I would like to test with a shared library also and more tracepoints. I was looking for an agreement on using the constructor for rte_log as well(Just make sure the direction is correct). Next steps: - I will analyze the come back on this overhead on this thread. - Olivier is OK for changing the RTE_LOG_REGSISTER macro, So we could clean the log as well. > Really nice. > > > -- > David Marchand >