From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA5ECA0526; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:45:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8123A1BFD1; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:45:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com (mail-io1-f68.google.com [209.85.166.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08882199BC; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 10:45:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id e64so1687709iof.12; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 01:45:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=iD9Y75iRPykQBYbrYy/a9IMIQm1LmtdYIUkhFiJ8ikU=; b=A1OdwcUBtCEUJoo6PUemrkE6NUtAzHw55vzNu9m9/uVknteLF7zgBQ20OA6kOqRwUn 4AdYsj1PjWUe6UqYcGd8eN5NcqG8KNi/D6jcppUQld6etd756UwNlu5tyrkNqQE1/X78 Poj/4BtTu5nXDnV2Z9ct7xrXLInbDldg4KknHetMtXGusIC2ExunBJvThvWgsPK/SLue 88I5IDp6M2znr/BHQBlK4ahU5XbjFbtHsnRIwuuiOrEf0QN0Fz48qj6J55plaLMbYtSY 55XDqUuDHv4B/gWiFCA4QUPCOltup3On1CYwa1Ma6nqsiLhEC4ss/bir5kvvP4/C7Uxs gjXw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=iD9Y75iRPykQBYbrYy/a9IMIQm1LmtdYIUkhFiJ8ikU=; b=E4M7iWa90T5U+u6JR8hWHn9qqC+yzLMTLg7IrCfdrSMegCzQiJke3Dg6Az20ea01q+ xd+kSyYqcs5ZzKyTHYZ8p9TZJvM7zIEwaPvYu1IxkMRJQ5Mxpgs/WRYjV558v/sssRdO ajICKeieX4t4mi3tg4wCGQFzgquDZGLOEc4umXy19fep23LqPia/rJs1UwoqMwZqQ/iX XKJmDKs/1dIUGrPNXTt6MfGEUNgqc4apaRJSNCnJVohp1rchIHNJdhAmaWBiGSDZKUBR m1++6+wam3A5gzndkkubpT3M7IpAlj1J5k8DztFz0e6g+kfEhyA59uLmKWHOOveCsZR+ 6ExA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531vfLmtlzY9gmzXEUUq+VQOeCvyBMT2akV/lsRMsn6D+iymzicj IcZ0+EFwRCwjm/yw2zCga7qoet/wjU39hh/GFsA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx6Pk6Z1M1nBYZBNvzqcc6J0OEs1Mdla0v3GDDdVH4TgLiZhBtwie4j+/pwlK/xUp/nMGaYF92rRwcSc1zSRrY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:21c7:: with SMTP id c7mr32103544ioc.1.1595407518200; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 01:45:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200306164104.15528-1-aostruszka@marvell.com> <98CBD80474FA8B44BF855DF32C47DC35C6110C@smartserver.smartshare.dk> <41291e3d-b902-46af-2915-2a76c6d89097@marvell.com> <1734533.zqhfolzEdB@thomas> In-Reply-To: <1734533.zqhfolzEdB@thomas> From: Jerin Jacob Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:15:01 +0530 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Andrzej Ostruszka [C]" , =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= , Stephen Hemminger , dpdk-dev , techboard@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] lib: introduce IF Proxy library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 6:10 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > In addition may I ask your opinion on the changes that are required > > before the library can be accepted? > > Very few contributors take time to look at it. > Clearly we want this feature. We really want it, > but we are not able to dedicate enough time for its review (blaming myself). > That's why I Cc the techboard to try a new process: > > For such feature requiring a community design, > and not having enough feedback to progress in a timely manner, > I propose drafting the design in a Technical Board meeting > (a regular or specific one). Since the patch series already have the documentation for library[1], example application [2] in addition to the implementation. For everyone's benefit, it would good to know what is the expectation of draft design so that one can create such a document as part of the new process and it can apply for new another library. [1] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71953/ [2] http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/71956/ > >