DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Adel Belkhiri <adel.belkhiri@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: Ethdev tracepoints optimization
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 17:41:21 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1NKUSTNm6BSTPYUuyf=sz_KZNcE2tMWYA+qKc5RA8TSSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMxxxdOnFgSJqyi66x4xUMBwtbQsW_OCcga5WpZRbJv4zHrLkQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 4:43 AM Adel Belkhiri <adel.belkhiri@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi DPDK Community,
>
> I am currently working on developing performance analyses for applications using the ethdev library. These analyses are being implemented in Trace Compass, an open-source performance analyzer. One of the views I’ve implemented shows the rate of traffic received or sent by an ethernet port, measured in packets per second. However, I've encountered an issue with the lib.ethdev.rx.burst event, which triggers even when no packets are polled, leading to a significant number of irrelevant events in the trace. This becomes problematic as these "empty" events can overwhelm the tracer buffer, potentially causing the loss of more critical events due to their high frequency.
>
> To address this, I've modified the DPDK code in lib/ethdev/rte_ethdev.h to add a conditional statement that only triggers the event when nb_rx > 0. My question to the community is whether there are use cases where an "empty" lib.ethdev.rx.burst event could be useful. If not, would there be interest in submitting a patch with this modification?
>
> Moreover, I am looking to develop an analysis that calculates the throughput (in kb/s, mb/s, etc.) per NIC, utilizing the same events (i.e., lib.ethdev.rx.burst and lib.ethdev.tx.burst). These tracepoints do not provide packet size directly, only a pointer to the packet array. My attempt to use an eBPF program to iterate through that array to access the packet sizes was unsuccessful, as I found no method to export the computed data (e.g., via a custom tracepoint). Does anyone have suggestions or alternative approaches for achieving a throughput measurement?


Call rte_eth_stats_get() in N second interval and find throughput in slow path.



> I would be grateful for any insights or suggestions you might have.
>
> Thank you!
> Adel

  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-16 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-15 19:32 Adel Belkhiri
2024-08-16 12:11 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2024-08-19  9:25 ` Bruce Richardson
2024-08-19 10:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-08-19 11:37   ` Jerin Jacob
2024-08-19 12:01     ` Bruce Richardson
2024-08-19 12:20     ` Morten Brørup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALBAE1NKUSTNm6BSTPYUuyf=sz_KZNcE2tMWYA+qKc5RA8TSSg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=adel.belkhiri@gmail.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).