From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:10:43 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1NXX0VQRX0ybAS7a5k8YFw4R5-uybUhZQG+UsArOpU2ig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210318102550.59265-3-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:56 PM Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Both L2 and L3 headers will be used in forward processing. And these
> two headers are in the same cache line. It has the same effect for
> prefetching with L2 header address and prefetching with L3 header
> address.
>
> Changed to use L2 header address for prefetching. The change showed
> no measurable performance improvement, but it definitely removed
Same here.
> unnecessary instructions for address calculation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> ---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
> index ae8840694..1650ae444 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm_neon.h
> @@ -98,14 +98,14 @@ l3fwd_lpm_send_packets(int nb_rx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts_burst,
> if (k) {
> for (i = 0; i < FWDSTEP; i++) {
> rte_prefetch0_write(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[i],
> - struct rte_ether_hdr *) + 1);
> + void *));
> }
>
> for (j = 0; j != k - FWDSTEP; j += FWDSTEP) {
> for (i = 0; i < FWDSTEP; i++) {
> rte_prefetch0_write(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(
> pkts_burst[j + i + FWDSTEP],
> - struct rte_ether_hdr *) + 1);
> + void *));
> }
>
> processx4_step1(&pkts_burst[j], &dip, &ipv4_flag);
> @@ -125,17 +125,17 @@ l3fwd_lpm_send_packets(int nb_rx, struct rte_mbuf **pkts_burst,
> switch (m) {
> case 3:
> rte_prefetch0_write(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
> - struct rte_ether_hdr *) + 1);
> + void *));
> j++;
> /* fallthrough */
> case 2:
> rte_prefetch0_write(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
> - struct rte_ether_hdr *) + 1);
> + void *));
> j++;
> /* fallthrough */
> case 1:
> rte_prefetch0_write(rte_pktmbuf_mtod(pkts_burst[j],
> - struct rte_ether_hdr *) + 1);
> + void *));
> j++;
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 10:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] examples/l3fwd: tune prefetch for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-13 20:00 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-19 7:52 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:40 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:43 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-14 6:02 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/l3fwd: make data struct to be memory efficient Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 19:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-21 5:22 ` Hemant Agrawal
2021-04-26 10:55 ` Walsh, Conor
2021-04-27 1:19 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 8:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:33 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-16 9:39 ` Ling, WeiX
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] examples/l3fwd: reorganize code for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:39 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-05 8:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALBAE1NXX0VQRX0ybAS7a5k8YFw4R5-uybUhZQG+UsArOpU2ig@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).