From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9242C42D0E; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:34:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E8D40DFB; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:34:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ua1-f45.google.com (mail-ua1-f45.google.com [209.85.222.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2D140DDC; Wed, 21 Jun 2023 06:34:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ua1-f45.google.com with SMTP id a1e0cc1a2514c-786e637f06dso1962362241.2; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 21:34:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687322064; x=1689914064; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=l1YaZ14bvKabD++5fQgnr2cPh5/CoqOn/46KKBfEoS4=; b=KY4BlaqYsQKOIiCEF3fUbfj55de4qr+TFmCPLXcEEfyZXc/IqfDjzJzco8GOv48XAi M1VoNNVtgz3h2rBgSes8cdH6GFxNXjfP75MKVcHPxg0mljcNKgSxMWsjFm385qokMnyr 2Hr+6F5gp+eKm2UukVJkjU3U/wS+ECbIbYOHhY8eh34SaS3ZLNXj1/5+ogXlngnKr3CZ BS2L5IEPqoM6P3L7n8Mb4hI4tMb8hofSfz3ndcRoE/P478vop3P3uZ723h/2RxG/mf2d ng4l8Cf/5N17IcXVASXxREi05AqcAz6uE26EqNiUAKTLE4vpjTLj7NyLHGdReH2ZQjE+ IKWQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687322064; x=1689914064; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=l1YaZ14bvKabD++5fQgnr2cPh5/CoqOn/46KKBfEoS4=; b=M+WyNzilHXi7Ao+wQiCFy3GJGv4MQqQBl4VdMTgwe5jhs1lYhYu4WVt5pKRNl9/Rhq dRyd6MT7cWixFeDvRiy8f5y/ubz5LG9wcb5qCJ7aWFZCCvQKD+usa/5VyFWAYC3gRo1y DKogzPINQ5YEMiHRycrDJnxGwJaxCn968JNl3G18yTtz13WOK5W426JQKtteB3L5zNYD AoEwMIVhB3Go7aRQZhN6h4SxAFm3Ah5uuK7zIl8X9DsruajNCU7XwfqpEOl1mMZoioCh 1YjsTdW430vyopLJtD9ytB4ZUpCJZSHH7KWTRjsFUQHbfDU9Eo20aPSvhlCh4o3c9VBz TzEA== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxtQ9Al+RuOnZHJNS/5biHbXEniNd5us+IH/SWDFCpP0GiKErlQ 0ijA/5qv+soVbBTn9KiVoOc/sxJWULfOJdQlaTc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ5P61eqCyX5YNJftMjEC9MecvPrmyGMmv5V3Wreyj2pH00QFJkkLZgri2XrRMiNg7L2blDdXhAApZJFs0UDc6I= X-Received: by 2002:a67:fc82:0:b0:440:afe5:ac1b with SMTP id x2-20020a67fc82000000b00440afe5ac1bmr3093980vsp.35.1687322063913; Tue, 20 Jun 2023 21:34:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230620110137.1416830-1-psatheesh@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: <20230620110137.1416830-1-psatheesh@marvell.com> From: Jerin Jacob Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2023 10:03:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/cnxk: fix incorrect queue index validation To: psatheesh@marvell.com Cc: Nithin Dabilpuram , Kiran Kumar K , Sunil Kumar Kori , Satha Rao , dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 4:32=E2=80=AFPM wrote: > > From: Satheesh Paul > > When creating a flow rule directing traffic from PF > to VF, current validation is incorrectly checking the > RQ index in flow action with the PF's maximum > configured RQs. This validation is applicable only > when action target is an RQ of the PF. The validation > has been modified accordingly. > > Fixes: 8c009b4505e ("net/cnxk: support flow API") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Satheesh Paul > Reviewed-by: Kiran Kumar K Applied to dpdk-next-net-mrvl/for-next-net. Thanks