DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: "Vamsi Attunuru" <vattunuru@marvell.com>,
	"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: fengchengwen@huawei.com, dev@dpdk.org, kevin.laatz@intel.com,
	 bruce.richardson@intel.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
	anoobj@marvell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: announce dmadev new capability addition
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2024 20:50:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1ORvP51OgM1Hgks39nHG-rqYYV3M5_gu=NfYE-4CAfCsg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240729124927.264458-1-vattunuru@marvell.com>

On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 6:19 PM Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> Announce addition of new capability flag and fields in

The new capability flag won't break ABI. We can mention only fields
update rte_dma_info and rte_dma_conf structures.

Another option is new set APIs for priority enablement.  The downside
is more code. All, opinions?


> rte_dma_info and rte_dma_conf structures.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vamsi Attunuru <vattunuru@marvell.com>
> ---
> RFC:
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20240729115558.263574-1-vattunuru@marvell.com/
>
>  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 5 +++++
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> index 6948641ff6..05d28473c0 100644
> --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> @@ -147,3 +147,8 @@ Deprecation Notices
>    will be deprecated and subsequently removed in DPDK 24.11 release.
>    Before this, the new port library API (functions rte_swx_port_*)
>    will gradually transition from experimental to stable status.
> +
> +* dmadev: A new flag ``RTE_DMA_CAPA_QOS`` will be introduced to advertise
> +  dma device's QoS capability. Also new fields will be added in ``rte_dma_info``
> +  and ``rte_dma_conf`` structures to get device supported priority levels
> +  and to configure the required priority level.
> --
> 2.25.1
>

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-29 15:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-29 12:49 Vamsi Attunuru
2024-07-29 15:20 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2024-07-29 17:17   ` Morten Brørup
2024-07-31 10:24   ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-30 12:10 ` [PATCH v2] doc: announce changes to dma device structures Amit Prakash Shukla
2024-07-30 12:53 ` [PATCH v3] " Amit Prakash Shukla
2024-07-30 14:46   ` [PATCH v4] " Amit Prakash Shukla
2024-07-30 17:27     ` Jerin Jacob
2024-07-31 11:01       ` Thomas Monjalon
2024-07-31 16:06         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALBAE1ORvP51OgM1Hgks39nHG-rqYYV3M5_gu=NfYE-4CAfCsg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=vattunuru@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).