From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76E6A051A; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:35:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682022904; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:35:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com (mail-io1-f68.google.com [209.85.166.68]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37291AFF for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 14:35:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id n11so25995644iom.9 for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:35:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=sLw6rnGrU2Bv26ArFhIiO1OCaQZi8kqXXiVCl4OD0Lg=; b=nRCVO+u32FPikTxjVSSJ03Uj+pKah5Y7Sm3IQGIDcLj+T7xcW/GFSaqbidNp/L3Zx+ XT5sQSMnwqodvB6XdaNEabNHXRhXy1G6GoF725h7YlBv1ijJ5e1aSpS6vnqFwTSigRrX cWd/mWtgg5yfYUyCsRDEEfkc8K4u4QxfGac+LnlifhWlfgI3tKYxBNprvoknrQjUVo8R /6W8yUa5aVff2osE9P4rVX4GZCqWILMIMJDGM1aEo0GpxrYObk93bfxNBmcwsPeYkpKb MjX3Cvybg+IQEcCwqZOj9Zzs1WOsukqKpZ2+s2yWMz+a/KC9FqCao/A+uCw3NMDoNs5z obXg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=sLw6rnGrU2Bv26ArFhIiO1OCaQZi8kqXXiVCl4OD0Lg=; b=J0tbS9kfVdDsDgjggnUSzSxXu96qdn3V2M3OzkkJPGbyBb0Q1/4nWpngoMZ/mfZy7g j+mRnJTbQ2f/Koca9AryfwSgTJWlrXylRK70I+3Cx5apURph02Vu8emD4VYEGPDiF/zZ R/54s2hCYLi7jb07FAMncSibYqD2B5G8zfFE+CoEQhJlIyunVwH8/DCb/dkapI5o6k3m 6VbPjIvvP8ww+MTk/ZrVb+Ij09UNCL2GWNSXKtKgYwDMwgIbaerQfv77F3geNh+YyLhw GwH+vecg6uL/gD8tj9zNT4muKBMy2qum1An+DaVxPOilxNM4byawyENXxHF/NkXKsTKA mDOw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUWDnLo9Cb2FCV8BnwAo1vDCC2M45+mz5cWA2PpkZEvwN3tAtC2 Gg//daqxDzC/gz9NvcEnzRjo8Z7k8D3ltXDEEZY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqztJE+9qpKHkrTRxxStOP9yMRuhPy6RlwuTlf4xvJ/9osSoti6nKveKcv2BK6N2egn3JWXO9CF2GPpzanEoB+0= X-Received: by 2002:a5e:8e4d:: with SMTP id r13mr28924081ioo.60.1579268107021; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 05:35:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190906190510.11146-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20200116052511.8557-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jerin Jacob Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 19:04:50 +0530 Message-ID: To: David Marchand Cc: Honnappa Nagarahalli , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "sthemmin@microsoft.com" , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "pbhagavatula@marvell.com" , "konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" , "yipeng1.wang@intel.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , Dharmik Thakkar , Ruifeng Wang , Gavin Hu , nd , Aaron Conole , "Van Haaren, Harry" , =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/6] lib/ring: APIs to support custom element size X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 5:44 PM David Marchand wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:36 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli > wrote: > > > > I see that the none of the CIs (except Travis) have run on this patch. Intel CI has reported a compilation error and I fixed it in this version. Does anyone know if/when the CI will run on the patches? > > - Pushed the series > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=8147 to a branch > of mine for checks. > Travis reports: > " > [2155/2156] Compiling C object 'app/te...st@@dpdk-test@exe/test_ring_perf.c.o'. > > No output has been received in the last 10m0s, this potentially > indicates a stalled build or something wrong with the build itself. > > Check the details on how to adjust your build configuration on: > https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/common-build-problems/#build-times-out-because-no-output-was-received > > The build has been terminated > " > > I see you discussed this already with Aaron, did I miss something? > > > - Besides, I have no ack/review from the hash and eventdev maintainers. + Bruce, Harry, Mattias Even though event ring added in the eventdev common code, it's been used only by SW eventdev drivers. So adding evendev ring author and SW driver maintainers for review. > > > -- > David Marchand >