From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
Cc: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Ankur Dwivedi <adwivedi@marvell.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>,
Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
Narayana Prasad <pathreya@marvell.com>, dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: allow multiple security sessions to use one rte flow
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2019 13:07:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1OyQJ=V253rCv5dSsyxKBkPGH+qinghDCd0A+y-db7VBw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1575801683-27269-1-git-send-email-anoobj@marvell.com>
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 4:19 PM Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> The rte_security API which enables inline protocol/crypto feature
> mandates that for every security session an rte_flow is created. This
> would internally translate to a rule in the hardware which would do
> packet classification.
>
> In rte_securty, one SA would be one security session. And if an rte_flow
> need to be created for every session, the number of SAs supported by an
> inline implementation would be limited by the number of rte_flows the
> PMD would be able to support.
>
> If the fields SPI & IP addresses are allowed to be a range, then this
> limitation can be overcome. Multiple flows will be able to use one rule
> for SECURITY processing. In this case, the security session provided as
> conf would be NULL.
>
> Application should do an rte_flow_validate() to make sure the flow is
> supported on the PMD.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
Reviewed-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h | 6 ++++++
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> index 452d359..21fa7ed 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_flow.h
> @@ -2239,6 +2239,12 @@ struct rte_flow_action_meter {
> * direction.
> *
> * Multiple flows can be configured to use the same security session.
> + *
> + * The NULL value is allowed for security session. If security session is NULL,
> + * then SPI field in ESP flow item and IP addresses in flow items 'IPv4' and
> + * 'IPv6' will be allowed to be a range. The rule thus created can enable
> + * SECURITY processing on multiple flows.
> + *
> */
> struct rte_flow_action_security {
> void *security_session; /**< Pointer to security session structure. */
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-09 7:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-08 10:41 Anoob Joseph
2019-12-09 7:37 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2019-12-10 20:47 ` Ori Kam
2020-01-20 9:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-12-09 13:18 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-09 13:57 ` Anoob Joseph
2019-12-11 11:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-11 17:33 ` Anoob Joseph
2019-12-13 11:55 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-15 6:07 ` Anoob Joseph
2019-12-16 12:54 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-12-16 15:37 ` Anoob Joseph
2019-12-16 15:58 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-12-16 16:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Anoob Joseph
2019-12-17 11:21 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-12-17 14:24 ` Anoob Joseph
2019-12-17 17:44 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-12-18 3:54 ` Anoob Joseph
2019-12-18 13:52 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-12-19 4:37 ` Anoob Joseph
2019-12-19 17:45 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2019-12-23 13:34 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2020-01-08 14:29 ` Medvedkin, Vladimir
2020-01-09 7:35 ` Ori Kam
2020-01-14 9:27 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-01-16 11:36 ` Ori Kam
2020-01-16 12:03 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-01-16 13:37 ` Ori Kam
2020-01-18 8:11 ` Anoob Joseph
2020-01-19 7:25 ` Ori Kam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALBAE1OyQJ=V253rCv5dSsyxKBkPGH+qinghDCd0A+y-db7VBw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=adwivedi@marvell.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=matan@mellanox.com \
--cc=pathreya@marvell.com \
--cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
--cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).