From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6389A0547;
	Sat,  7 Aug 2021 15:33:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDD440691;
	Sat,  7 Aug 2021 15:33:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-io1-f49.google.com (mail-io1-f49.google.com
 [209.85.166.49]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 003DB4003D
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat,  7 Aug 2021 15:33:17 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-io1-f49.google.com with SMTP id r72so3884613iod.6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 06:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=5sgDnmx/tMf0n/aHnPgLVjs3T/MZzQehR1iSuqFLMFI=;
 b=Q6jr5ftvfY8f+DqGDmnFaCzfqLNIpdv+cz732gWZjdrTYQ7CbtiJTyHaoPBnKreCRr
 jNFDidp3Uf4kAnI5aQ6tk2bw4Y+zxCUCHKV0f+Y0HFbcce5IWloA3ivYxmHSvAXhs3JJ
 HJfuULBAvfTfsifXJ7xWB0Ir2qyZ6gP2yV6xEEpX2qc4pJ2fnhocP1VV6/WEOhPVaDOo
 SwpLR28tRV7lOpMPwoO8buqJrwQ47MA6HxoyDFZrqs6ZFstAr/eKRyDjx5f3x2283Rbu
 raKW5OiSoQIBaQkBzzE5pbmXaGF1Uv4jBH12GI+Vd1L5HXwAarhKK2y0biEAV/3Rcer4
 Uriw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=5sgDnmx/tMf0n/aHnPgLVjs3T/MZzQehR1iSuqFLMFI=;
 b=NZ1sJMPlod0xfh1r7w+Zrob9bJPMjO23x/DDCWFNsxXUQAv7e/3EoDcdoiOXTsLYjG
 JmQbFF7Myrt74GUilhnCBRCTIBdY4oFuuHLVDmWfFgoooQ74UIS3N7m43z5o/dUdYl/y
 xQ/7QGDP9BHK/T/utak5qr5n42u29IOYq/YSH3Qixvqbw5hMgG/SI8h8YKpRV1qduqZX
 AY0l6/qmTRSGQQT+RbvCagFle6eUsjOBHU2NyQaefPIHPtRrKU7bfJhfHKssL7UyvjMN
 VvJLsWurbs4SpdNaBnT4UAlVC45wIUEo7L2pzyv2+3H4f6gttd9v5qCNmsdI03H7I0hy
 sjrg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531tMPKZf597FanCTX/xWGOn+e8Pq4xLiQjLICVGDS5BPDksddq6
 7AD5+IhC2/2+O/W1tHriwwRH+9SkKfGmRWk2uo4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2EDniWNX6QJntvEqIwNP8YCVU9Yk6guJ1tLSLZ5ZfGJWEag2ah1kuTfCNbFUXFI6cAv9zWvoZGfDgRhlGkYQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:71a:: with SMTP id
 f26mr101793iox.59.1628343197390; 
 Sat, 07 Aug 2021 06:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1627973317-231-1-git-send-email-anoobj@marvell.com>
 <CO6PR18MB448457785BC9895B62D78737D8F19@CO6PR18MB4484.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
 <DM6PR11MB449125175A823D5A1668062C9AF19@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB449125175A823D5A1668062C9AF19@DM6PR11MB4491.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Aug 2021 19:02:50 +0530
Message-ID: <CALBAE1PJTfgFT3_gtkR6iwi1WoFiz6qr9sQ+eWWA01CXK06+SQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
Cc: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>, 
 "Doherty, Declan" <declan.doherty@intel.com>, "Zhang,
 Roy Fan" <roy.fan.zhang@intel.com>, 
 Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
 Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <jerinj@marvell.com>, 
 Archana Muniganti <marchana@marvell.com>,
 Tejasree Kondoj <ktejasree@marvell.com>, 
 "Nicolau, Radu" <radu.nicolau@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce IPsec xform struct changes
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 11:05 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
<konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > IPsec xform struct would be updated to include IPsec SA lifetime
> > > configuration. The existing member 'esn_soft_limit' would only track
> > > ESN. And as sequence number control is getting introduced,
> > > 'esn_soft_limit' may not indicate the number of packets processed.
> > > Replace that with a new structure to cover all lifetime cases with
> > > support for specifying both soft and hard lifetimes.
> > >
> > > ESN control introduced by:
> > > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20210713133542.3550525-4-
> > > radu.nicolau@intel.com/
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
> > > ---
> > Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>
> >
>
> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>

Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>