From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] examples/l3fwd: reorganize code for better performance
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2021 00:04:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1PcbAL4TLGaKY7uoWX4X1W1xr2fTtb4=ne6FzkVrgT1xQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210601075653.84927-2-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 1:27 PM Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Moved rfc1812 process prior to NEON registers store.
> On N1SDP, this reorganization mitigates CPU frontend stall and backend
> stall when forwarding.
>
> On N1SDP with MLX5 40G NIC, this change showed 10.2% performance gain
> in single port single core MRR test.
I think, it may not have anything to do with N1SDP, It could be just
the prefetch window timing
with MLX5 driver on Tx mbuf on touching with tx_burst() and L1 cache
pressure timing.
I think, tuning the driver parameters can switch the window to some driver code.
On Octeontx2, this change has regression of -3.1% flow lookup miss
case. so NACK.
> On ThunderX2, this changed showed no performance degradation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
> ---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h | 10 +++++-----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h
> index 86ac5971d7..ea7fe22d00 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_neon.h
> @@ -43,11 +43,6 @@ processx4_step3(struct rte_mbuf *pkt[FWDSTEP], uint16_t dst_port[FWDSTEP])
> ve[2] = vsetq_lane_u32(vgetq_lane_u32(te[2], 3), ve[2], 3);
> ve[3] = vsetq_lane_u32(vgetq_lane_u32(te[3], 3), ve[3], 3);
>
> - vst1q_u32(p[0], ve[0]);
> - vst1q_u32(p[1], ve[1]);
> - vst1q_u32(p[2], ve[2]);
> - vst1q_u32(p[3], ve[3]);
> -
> rfc1812_process((struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)
> ((struct rte_ether_hdr *)p[0] + 1),
> &dst_port[0], pkt[0]->packet_type);
> @@ -60,6 +55,11 @@ processx4_step3(struct rte_mbuf *pkt[FWDSTEP], uint16_t dst_port[FWDSTEP])
> rfc1812_process((struct rte_ipv4_hdr *)
> ((struct rte_ether_hdr *)p[3] + 1),
> &dst_port[3], pkt[3]->packet_type);
> +
> + vst1q_u32(p[0], ve[0]);
> + vst1q_u32(p[1], ve[1]);
> + vst1q_u32(p[2], ve[2]);
> + vst1q_u32(p[3], ve[3]);
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-06 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 10:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] examples/l3fwd: tune prefetch for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-13 20:00 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-19 7:52 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:40 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:43 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-14 6:02 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/l3fwd: make data struct to be memory efficient Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 19:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-21 5:22 ` Hemant Agrawal
2021-04-26 10:55 ` Walsh, Conor
2021-04-27 1:19 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 8:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:33 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-16 9:39 ` Ling, WeiX
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] examples/l3fwd: reorganize code for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:34 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:39 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-05 8:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALBAE1PcbAL4TLGaKY7uoWX4X1W1xr2fTtb4=ne6FzkVrgT1xQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).