From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/l3fwd: make data struct to be memory efficient
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 00:36:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1Pdj5Kq+6Qt=DaFKKg20Aj-s7wD8ywOBMCY1=W1qXd-hA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210318102550.59265-5-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2021 at 3:56 PM Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> wrote:
>
> There are some holes in data struct lcore_conf. The holes are
> due to alignment requirement.
>
> For struct lcore_rx_queue, there is no need to make every element
> of this type to be cache line aligned, because the data is not
> shared between cores.
>
> Member len of struct mbuf_table can be moved out. So data can be
> packed and there will be no need to load an extra cache line when
> mbuf table is empty.
>
> The change showed slight performance improvement on N1SDP platform.
>
> Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
This change alone is OK in the octeontx2 platform.(No difference in performance)
combining with 3/4 shows some regression. Probably is due to prefetch
or 128B cache line tuning specifics.
> ---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h | 12 ++++++------
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_common.h | 4 ++--
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 6 +++---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 6 +++---
> 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h
> index 2cf06099e..f3a301e12 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd.h
> @@ -57,22 +57,22 @@
> #define HASH_ENTRY_NUMBER_DEFAULT 4
>
> struct mbuf_table {
> - uint16_t len;
> struct rte_mbuf *m_table[MAX_PKT_BURST];
> };
>
> struct lcore_rx_queue {
> uint16_t port_id;
> uint8_t queue_id;
> -} __rte_cache_aligned;
> +};
>
> struct lcore_conf {
> - uint16_t n_rx_queue;
> struct lcore_rx_queue rx_queue_list[MAX_RX_QUEUE_PER_LCORE];
> - uint16_t n_tx_port;
> uint16_t tx_port_id[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> uint16_t tx_queue_id[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> + uint16_t tx_mbuf_len[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> struct mbuf_table tx_mbufs[RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS];
> + uint16_t n_rx_queue;
> + uint16_t n_tx_port;
> void *ipv4_lookup_struct;
> void *ipv6_lookup_struct;
> } __rte_cache_aligned;
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ send_single_packet(struct lcore_conf *qconf,
> {
> uint16_t len;
>
> - len = qconf->tx_mbufs[port].len;
> + len = qconf->tx_mbuf_len[port];
> qconf->tx_mbufs[port].m_table[len] = m;
> len++;
>
> @@ -132,7 +132,7 @@ send_single_packet(struct lcore_conf *qconf,
> len = 0;
> }
>
> - qconf->tx_mbufs[port].len = len;
> + qconf->tx_mbuf_len[port] = len;
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_common.h b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_common.h
> index 7d83ff641..05e03dbfc 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_common.h
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_common.h
> @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ send_packetsx4(struct lcore_conf *qconf, uint16_t port, struct rte_mbuf *m[],
> {
> uint32_t len, j, n;
>
> - len = qconf->tx_mbufs[port].len;
> + len = qconf->tx_mbuf_len[port];
>
> /*
> * If TX buffer for that queue is empty, and we have enough packets,
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ send_packetsx4(struct lcore_conf *qconf, uint16_t port, struct rte_mbuf *m[],
> }
> }
>
> - qconf->tx_mbufs[port].len = len;
> + qconf->tx_mbuf_len[port] = len;
> }
>
> #endif /* _L3FWD_COMMON_H_ */
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> index 9996bfba3..1970e0376 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> @@ -662,12 +662,12 @@ em_main_loop(__rte_unused void *dummy)
>
> for (i = 0; i < qconf->n_tx_port; ++i) {
> portid = qconf->tx_port_id[i];
> - if (qconf->tx_mbufs[portid].len == 0)
> + if (qconf->tx_mbuf_len[portid] == 0)
> continue;
> send_burst(qconf,
> - qconf->tx_mbufs[portid].len,
> + qconf->tx_mbuf_len[portid],
> portid);
> - qconf->tx_mbufs[portid].len = 0;
> + qconf->tx_mbuf_len[portid] = 0;
> }
>
> prev_tsc = cur_tsc;
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> index d338590b9..e62139a0e 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
> @@ -220,12 +220,12 @@ lpm_main_loop(__rte_unused void *dummy)
>
> for (i = 0; i < n_tx_p; ++i) {
> portid = qconf->tx_port_id[i];
> - if (qconf->tx_mbufs[portid].len == 0)
> + if (qconf->tx_mbuf_len[portid] == 0)
> continue;
> send_burst(qconf,
> - qconf->tx_mbufs[portid].len,
> + qconf->tx_mbuf_len[portid],
> portid);
> - qconf->tx_mbufs[portid].len = 0;
> + qconf->tx_mbuf_len[portid] = 0;
> }
>
> prev_tsc = cur_tsc;
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-13 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-18 10:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] examples/l3fwd: tune prefetch for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-13 20:00 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2021-05-19 7:52 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 18:40 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:43 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-14 6:02 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-03-18 10:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] examples/l3fwd: make data struct to be memory efficient Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 19:06 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2021-04-21 5:22 ` Hemant Agrawal
2021-04-26 10:55 ` Walsh, Conor
2021-04-27 1:19 ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 8:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-04-13 17:33 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-04-16 9:39 ` Ling, WeiX
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] " Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] examples/l3fwd: reorganize code for better performance Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01 7:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-06 18:39 ` Jerin Jacob
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary calculations Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-10 6:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] examples/l3fwd: eliminate unnecessary reloads in loop Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-05 8:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] l3fwd improvements David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALBAE1Pdj5Kq+6Qt=DaFKKg20Aj-s7wD8ywOBMCY1=W1qXd-hA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).