From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B1C4263F; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:37:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DCA40277; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:37:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vk1-f169.google.com (mail-vk1-f169.google.com [209.85.221.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFE840271; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 09:37:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 71dfb90a1353d-49618e09f16so2758641e0c.2; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:37:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1695713876; x=1696318676; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=u/Fm1ZAjPwni71Jk7+hHSKPqhR+PSO6YYivqW0uJYyg=; b=YkqxZyYaaMsWgst/gTDG5NXejjlIBf6ctvycYyPOxnNwtArxU7bnTkwRd0CQrw5fx2 iWn+OFUWJ0Z58n6DNDJDADlp0Zl6mSNqkt3IjibTTjZW/78G+Cnd1uV/RtxsB5D/5Vo9 NqX1u/12GH9J2bNEx/CHrOfTtjEEOjtXb8oI+QbNw7i6HA0YY0KFWE/PFapP+dk3ogmS 0ffccoJiVM7C55Uuf7qWu/N6ULwlFnBa5FK/KlXB1HXK34rHqJ26K2cTMTGyOgJAn0bS 5pGB1QDvGENrZ0tsPykkKeOOJ4jce7MpYNAT6xx/XwDB7sdR21//MZLCjuHiQUWpLI1h z+5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1695713876; x=1696318676; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=u/Fm1ZAjPwni71Jk7+hHSKPqhR+PSO6YYivqW0uJYyg=; b=HSAwXtj2ePyzRphBrRfBT/tEF2kJ4bi/Shzjmb4xWh2cqgDE+4L3mI8SB6dYeDI1v0 hcVslyIJuK9H+VzF875R1XfRYdWbV1ketDa2Tn30ZadWhlI35Nmp1frsrE2ZyK/pGtGO ciStQQpnGr9EoupvwTKZb50KstVh0sWZUGOxdUoX1nYlD5Exn8di8bsvC7459qWTBSk0 +J6F8x4GOGf4A0U0VCMRy5RJ7vR4SnLYY60l9pfqKhZWp2tREtxG8ZQEQkdr1RfDEnYx tLRl60/7qGcdbwbh1CCC6ezo3einTPWJhbZb9M3UtC+stxlrgOjiWw6+19QP6DJuDX3Y EKQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxdyX1dppLuvdH+eAceeTYSN6b0629+FPj7MHBjF/W4T1PIJTWk 1A43yflsWDHa9YLCm7/Ezmvt64OvV5IO3EsBxkc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHGdUP4PFSWBlSkklzIzlepZKJTux+exqZEqDkmpIkhp45wK4idFPRnGVMpPFNXuz0Rvs4F7vb/uFzObdAz67o= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6122:1781:b0:49a:3d72:fe7c with SMTP id o1-20020a056122178100b0049a3d72fe7cmr4132446vkf.15.1695713876369; Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:37:56 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230918082553.704859-1-rbhansali@marvell.com> In-Reply-To: From: Jerin Jacob Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 13:07:30 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] eventdev/eth_rx: fix timestamp field register in mbuf To: "Naga Harish K, S V" , Qi Zhang , Thomas Monjalon , Ali Alnubani , Ferruh Yigit , David Marchand , Andrew Rybchenko , Ajit Khaparde , Raslan Darawsheh , Maxime Coquelin , cheng1.jiang@intel.com, Akhil Goyal , "Richardson, Bruce" Cc: Rahul Bhansali , "dev@dpdk.org" , Jerin Jacob , "Kundapura, Ganapati" , "stable@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 3:48=E2=80=AFPM Naga Harish K, S V wrote: > > As per the DPDK contribution guidelines, > Ideally, the review should be done within 1 week of patch submission to t= he mailing list. > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/contributing/patches.html > > Surprised to see this review request ping message the very next day of th= e patch. > Better to follow the contribution guidelines. + @Thomas Monjalon @Ali Alnubani @Ferruh Yigit @David Marchand @Andrew Rybchenko @Ajit Khaparde @Qi Zhang @Raslan Darawsheh @Maxime Coquelin @cheng1.jiang@intel.com @Akhil Goyal @Richardson, Bruce Yes, and I agree, and thanks for reporting this. I usually merge a set of patches together and call for review action if something pending in my list. I was not looking to the timestamp as it was manual. Seems like good feature additions in patchwork if it not ready available or if available then we can configure for DPDK. i.e., if patchwork can track email time for the patch and flag for no reviewed happened in N days(N as configurable) to help maintainers. Also, Get list of pending patches on component maintainers(I think, currently we can get only based on tree delegation) not per component maintainer. > > -Harish