From: Jerin Jacob <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>, dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: set boot-up log prints to absolute minimum
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 00:18:38 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALBAE1PyGB+6x6i6gwegerV=_TMijv5OCy6vf6j166AgUWhhEA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4168892.bm5RmrZB5H@thomas>
On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:37 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
> 26/04/2020 19:42, Jerin Jacob:
> > On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 1:42 AM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > > 06/02/2020 15:36, Jerin Jacob:
> > > > On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 7:44 PM Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > > > > 21/01/2020 09:00, jerinj@marvell.com:
> > > > > > From: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some machines may have a lot of PCI devices, logs from PCI probe
> > > > > > creates a lot of clutter on boot-up, typically one needs
> > > > > > to scroll the screen to find other issues in boot-up.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch changes the loglevel of PCI probes to `debug`
> > > > > > to reduce the clutter on default boot-up logs
> > > > >
> > > > > I think the PCI probe informations are... informational.
> > > > > Maybe you are just not interested in info logs.
> > > > > If this is the case, I suggest to change the log level at runtime.
> > > >
> > > > I am wondering, what would be the right balance, Following is DPDK
> > > > startup output from octeontx2[1]
> > > > It creates a lot of clutter in the "default" boot up. Why not enable
> > > > below prints using log level at runtime?
> > > > I believe it comes as a debug category, i.e information required to
> > > > debug if something is not working,
> > > > dpdk bind script already lists what is bound to DPDK.
> > > >
> > > > Suggestion to remove clutter?
> > >
> > > I suggest using dynamic log level in the PCI driver.
> > > Unfortunately a lot of old DPDK code is still using the old log macros.
> > > Some cleanup work is needed here.
> >
> > Sent an alternative fix to skip probing the devices with RTE_KDRV_NONE.
>
> No, a PCI PMD can work without a known kernel driver.
> This is the case of mlx4/mlx5.
Yes. it can work with UNKNOWN, But It not with NONE.
>
> > I think that is the source of the problem.
> > http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/69351/
>
> The source of the problem is just changing log levels dynamically
> is not possible currently with PCI driver logs.
Assuming if we add, dynamic stuff what would the default log level for
RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, "PCI device "PCI_PRI_FMT" on NUMA socket %i\n",
If it is INFO, Still the problem persist in the default bootup. Right?
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-26 18:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-21 8:00 jerinj
2020-02-06 14:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-02-06 14:36 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-25 20:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-26 17:42 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-26 18:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-26 18:48 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2020-04-26 19:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-27 18:02 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-04 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " jerinj
2020-05-07 13:54 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-07 15:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-11 14:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CALBAE1PyGB+6x6i6gwegerV=_TMijv5OCy6vf6j166AgUWhhEA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).