From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1521FA0C42;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:22:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C71540697;
	Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:22:41 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail-lj1-f170.google.com (mail-lj1-f170.google.com
 [209.85.208.170])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBA040147
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:22:40 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-lj1-f170.google.com with SMTP id a5so35208958ljk.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 28 Apr 2021 06:22:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=semihalf-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=oVNFUSOd7CxVK67oNMgikFBibKGztbXjtG+DIXRykdU=;
 b=ekvH7zPSRTk3modTEt2OYWQMfTriTlJIo7KSY82dsCtQvfMe5mxUI+D6/ST5KaET+D
 TPKpSO1xVmWYkf5Eub1dHqxHCJC6UWwEAjwSkwRBZhDxwPYNcvxujfka9lbd8/sfPVaH
 IoTa5P27d8aXXwBrEoGAb+XlM+kAloYCx00KwWFOGXKcmFn0QEfeyDOFt9jy9HV13FQW
 Y0fhc0YbMu62g13v/pBC6LV6LZWHHcVg+BI9LtGWGONrAgFW4Zku0/53t3AfZwy13HiT
 qXQmsdeAIzGs+1xGl5TXpNDXg0HEI/Zg6ovCwlp4RYCQH2FqvtM6970WXPu9aQ9dYISK
 TKGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=oVNFUSOd7CxVK67oNMgikFBibKGztbXjtG+DIXRykdU=;
 b=F/Q1rRZwaHWEn5xTwVwiNcgqgPpIX1KWiNBtIi57KCTbxHFslma8gfK7NVaeU2pqKx
 o9ieQE5sK5JIzb8EdB7YTZ0LIsXS3Pu01NqSXvJE32Txxr37ajppQRTin3OMKvJhbgs/
 sBTVJYMypFU+o/JYpwl0rZdjH9j8I1Ya151rRriFDMfi5pUz4bHx/Ujd4Ako4eXcDQ1P
 e1hIbdpN4YlbhdLYbmkLpGfk8e1+TmN1iuc/UINfuC9g8CczyXCvl4YtCLSZ9a2/T+ky
 RZYqykVigFABn/+J4TzNzVeOGRwv4uMRfYJR22TVpA77/DAc7NmokgA3AFV0MKNQQdk8
 9lkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PXG5ErY0cZR/Yzt4kFJQsonaYBTYnmfNiVtTMJrfFJP70BHJn
 qQ1l/e2njAtp0SHZOOsgWLhVn+4jbuCbDrd5Lsd3lA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyj7Q72KMJJLs5c28rM/niR7+1UY8JaZykrXPa0gScDXrofr2CmSmX+GOtdScTZo6EPoEmqy3fICs818s+2Vgc=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:9957:: with SMTP id r23mr21591282ljj.306.1619616159417; 
 Wed, 28 Apr 2021 06:22:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210426163310.1043438-1-kda@semihalf.com>
 <CAJFAV8y91HEfAC8wAep1xNa1gP21Od6Ddf+0dQu7o=v5djYcBg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8y91HEfAC8wAep1xNa1gP21Od6Ddf+0dQu7o=v5djYcBg@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Stanis=C5=82aw_Kardach?= <kda@semihalf.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 15:22:28 +0200
Message-ID: <CALVGJWKGN-kXV+uDzpAj+=eUX_OcEDfEHXzECnRy2abT4_QkMw@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
 upstream@semihalf.com, 
 Lukasz Wojciechowski <l.wojciechow@partner.samsung.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] test/distributor: fix burst flush on
 worker quit
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:11 PM David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
wrote:
<snip>

>
> Do we have two fixes in a single patch?
> This is ok if both point at the same originating commit, but else, we
> need two patches with proper Fixes: line.
>
Those touch different commits, I'll split them and send together.

>
> I see we have reviews, can you submit non-rfc patches?
>
Will do.

>
> Thanks.
> --
> David Marchand
>
>