From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E6FA0547; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 21:33:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47BF24003D; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 21:33:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com (mail-wr1-f45.google.com [209.85.221.45]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E6A4003C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 21:33:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id c21so15908415wrb.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:33:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Kk7zwhedoN11Mm39V7DzTZvYYrYnisHYQG10GNs4v6A=; b=UNm806/PUSGjQ8zqcsr10+ZbhrH+xsOauEKJucZmjsduvK2u8nE96t9eK5Oz6lwJhb GNVf4h9pyF2EDFJB11bpVRMKYEsy5swEenKfYirbiHCaRZcM5DRkXLls8rcF8uM8HmDO v0kELefqKMmDDEpnMRJ1TBksbPFedZycBEcQ/ce6IGC7S3Vn3+9ExTVGvWatAk6EUCi0 wIzkhUnhvDjFRnZINqZ4w+BPxLdvvvG9ZO45Fz0DOHaLdVeJ1878ozW8kX0IGP31GHyZ xoNl/fqfwxAlakRp/3emG+goVj50NcevoABorenwojp8WTmrEOt+Uk/s6uDkOyYLgGSM pGNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Kk7zwhedoN11Mm39V7DzTZvYYrYnisHYQG10GNs4v6A=; b=snWgrrk6qlrOA1K4ugNYlRVQciHxqHShtcMBYIqz+rUnzCu1fAAifi9Ja/Z3AXeeET PmNQK67OTb/3eyEgTqqL/RBrk9qz/iARR9CfbSsZ5Efo5WQqvZnN6xSJ5E8QcW8u7ntN 6vKP/X0mS8bQdB5sxF+JU9jhIZLg+xffk9Dr+uK7obacswRZF85FrOwX271nNv7AWG2e TLC+gEQfQ5LCQoq/Aq72j+kGcHZglcFh0rrrmlwXI3opK9abHdfTIKoVsDmOBwr7MTi3 lRSKI4APIDDO31tKQTreCodaqWnDmw7jR6HXc7OTqbQaOO0SrRDYLDsz0Dl+Why0Boc8 cWiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532PTPw7zLmU6WfDE9qPVNvok6DfISnxhLdeY7uYv8ALKcG178/I /Q4HW0qz9cONzJNZ7gWoKj59Sv7eaCtT1irt35JFJD3D74E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyt+NTIgj5kVD6radL3yxI8ZtdzWilkJAwMHuvX5zWc5P+nmHbhKMcRBa43rkW+p4Bnas0jkVwefr9mFLDT2cE= X-Received: by 2002:adf:fc07:: with SMTP id i7mr23933377wrr.351.1632684811838; Sun, 26 Sep 2021 12:33:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Ramkumar Nallathambi Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 01:03:19 +0530 Message-ID: To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Symmetric hashing not working in ESXI version 7.0.0 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi Everyone, We are facing an issue with symmetric hashing. Below is the definition of symmetric hashing. The traffic from server A to server B and server B to server A should fall under the same flow. This is what we call symmetricity. I have configured the customized keys for symmetric hashing as suggested in the DPDK forum. After changing the key to the below symmetric hashing started working. *static uint8_t hash_key[RSS_HASH_KEY_LENGTH] = {* * 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A,* * 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A,* * 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A,* * 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A,* * 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A, 0x6D, 0x5A,* *};* *But it is working in ESXI server version 6.7.0, but does not work in ESXi server version 7.0.0.* Anyone aware of this issue. *We are using the vmxnet3 driver and DPDK version 19.11.* Regards, Ramkumar N.