From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>,
Shreyansh Jain <shreyansh.jain@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Restructure EAL device model for bus support
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 11:47:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALe+Z02QWa-0mZX06dq+Fn-YrLUvazxDpbZ2AcQfY6DLWKVJFA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29033576.pHDTdAbKFW@xps13>
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Thomas Monjalon
<thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> 2016-11-20 16:30, David Marchand:
>> For a first patchset, I would see:
>> - introduce the rte_bus object. In rte_eal_init, for each bus, we call
>> the scan method. Then, for each bus, we find the appropriate
>> rte_driver using the bus match method then call the probe method. If
>> the probe succeeds, the rte_device points to the associated
>> rte_driver,
>> - migrate the pci scan code to a pci bus (scan looks at sysfs for
>> linux / ioctl for bsd + devargs for blacklist / whitelist ?), match is
>> the same at what is done in rte_eal_pci_probe_one_driver() at the
>> moment,
>> - migrate the vdev init code to a vdev bus (scan looks at devargs):
>> this is new, we must create rte_device objects for vdev drivers to use
>> later
>
> I think it can be 3 patchsets.
> Who can work on the vdev part please?
I'll take a look.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-21 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-17 5:29 Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 5:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 1/6] eal: define container macro Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 12:06 ` Jan Blunck
2016-11-17 13:01 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 5:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 2/6] eal: introduce bus-device-driver structure Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 11:19 ` Jan Blunck
2016-11-17 13:00 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 16:13 ` Jan Blunck
2016-11-17 5:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 3/6] bus: add bus driver layer Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 5:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 4/6] eal/common: handle bus abstraction for device/driver objects Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 5:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 5/6] eal: supporting bus model in init process Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 5:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 6/6] eal: removing eth_driver Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 12:53 ` Jan Blunck
2016-11-18 13:05 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 11:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] Restructure EAL device model for bus support Jan Blunck
2016-11-17 13:08 ` Shreyansh Jain
2016-11-17 16:54 ` Jan Blunck
2016-11-20 15:30 ` David Marchand
2016-11-21 9:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-11-21 10:47 ` Jan Blunck [this message]
2016-11-23 9:45 ` Shreyansh Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CALe+Z02QWa-0mZX06dq+Fn-YrLUvazxDpbZ2AcQfY6DLWKVJFA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jblunck@infradead.org \
--cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).