From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jblunck@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f67.google.com (mail-wm0-f67.google.com [74.125.82.67])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD81BF977
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:19:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f67.google.com with SMTP id v77so14193636wmv.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:19:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
 :subject:to:cc;
 bh=Ew9yYs3ubwx7sy3ZhT9YiYRI/SZEGOaKdZKFAmDVL+o=;
 b=lfeYuZInrMMF8oDWLMFm1N1slAyLEdJlSdF3tVDRPWS0M37O8X/1ist0+c/C27f2Dk
 ja3pAowOsmqfBHGLLrrQhsg3uh24iCXpRL7M4yt3l5KSUQxizir3lAWoCTaGFO3ZLXY6
 zplGbuaeMDSrIi+88x5nu5wamkcsJfreAN+L8wm+7PwXb01mfr0unOJvrx9bpdh54y5I
 32IOTTJUokIi+1h67/qm583RzISnpMb3lpvVSHE5UjEB2AGn5zxE4AtYPjVYm9XIVz50
 eamoleb78g8FrMtUsoM2l+EomyCpnDxix1E1sd0XHIqCqeikhNIyIH4xbBpa59nZhfq2
 ThkQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from
 :date:message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=Ew9yYs3ubwx7sy3ZhT9YiYRI/SZEGOaKdZKFAmDVL+o=;
 b=eDdyMZscgad3pForX697aAFW2wxz4IQFbTsgD7QImM9MDC0q1dnEkeWKE+ekI7ZSwz
 +DYKJBwaJk3GEGGed6SuhIgXW5ayRxnvpO/Ty2gv2L8WDIS3j2GNXucDn2HiDr7WwECd
 V9Rld1ZY6I4KSEbDdmL5+GoLUgOw2IjrGWLj5d29wikopyGwX4pIutDAllwIj1Sdua1o
 1y3gmu+sddrGf+6zyjqRMcDBs8MheZcvnAO+vD2E7DE0XX100iAIeHBCwH1sbxhc/LFn
 T1CrRNFMWKcYxTJuljTN7DpPmios96BIUvJt9/sUiyLIkIUxYIGKu3B38BjRjkgz4XQ0
 qVXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n6NOpyPJ6VaKwTjdl8KiBH5A47kJZMu7hOlwlwMi4Om0m1X6x9/NoaAwkB+n1+x0YMrPOzm0rLs3itBA==
X-Received: by 10.28.140.135 with SMTP id o129mr2201435wmd.101.1488212353189; 
 Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:19:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jblunck@gmail.com
Received: by 10.28.211.20 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 08:19:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <1487801822-30938-2-git-send-email-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
References: <1487801822-30938-1-git-send-email-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
 <1487801822-30938-2-git-send-email-qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 17:19:12 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1gp3BJ_9jmVTS8pZTCYfxmkiApA
Message-ID: <CALe+Z03t0SQh+Rx0ZX8TNtaXDUj8f=nWoH8CpWbjru+qFTOLCg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: clean up interrupt handle
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 16:19:14 -0000

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:17 PM, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/eal_interrupts.c
> @@ -278,29 +278,6 @@ vfio_disable_msi(const struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle) {
>         return ret;
>  }
>
> -static int
> -get_max_intr(const struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle)
> -{
> -       struct rte_intr_source *src;
> -
> -       TAILQ_FOREACH(src, &intr_sources, next) {
> -               if (src->intr_handle.fd != intr_handle->fd)
> -                       continue;
> -
> -               if (src->intr_handle.max_intr < intr_handle->max_intr)
> -                       src->intr_handle.max_intr = intr_handle->max_intr;
> -               if (!src->intr_handle.max_intr)
> -                       src->intr_handle.max_intr = 1;
> -               else if (src->intr_handle.max_intr > RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID)
> -                       src->intr_handle.max_intr
> -                               = RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID + 1;
> -
> -               return src->intr_handle.max_intr;
> -       }
> -
> -       return -1;
> -}
> -
>  /* enable MSI-X interrupts */
>  static int
>  vfio_enable_msix(const struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle) {
> @@ -313,15 +290,10 @@ vfio_enable_msix(const struct rte_intr_handle *intr_handle) {
>
>         irq_set = (struct vfio_irq_set *) irq_set_buf;
>         irq_set->argsz = len;
> -
> -       ret = get_max_intr(intr_handle);
> -       if (ret < 0) {
> -               RTE_LOG(ERR, EAL, "Invalid number of MSI-X irqs for fd %d\n",
> -                       intr_handle->fd);
> -               return -1;
> -       }
> -
> -       irq_set->count = ret;
> +       /* 0 < irq_set->count < RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID + 1 */
> +       irq_set->count = intr_handle->max_intr ?
> +               (intr_handle->max_intr > RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID + 1 ?
> +               RTE_MAX_RXTX_INTR_VEC_ID + 1 : intr_handle->max_intr) : 1;
>         irq_set->flags = VFIO_IRQ_SET_DATA_EVENTFD | VFIO_IRQ_SET_ACTION_TRIGGER;
>         irq_set->index = VFIO_PCI_MSIX_IRQ_INDEX;
>         irq_set->start = 0;

The changes (to not change the interrupt handle in intr_sources) seems
to be unrelated to the API changes. Can you split this into two
commits, please?

Also I'm not 100% convinced that the low-level drivers should make
extensive use of the ethdev's const intr_handle. I believe that the
ethdev ops might be incomplete in that sense that it would be better
to add an rx_intr_ctl() operation to the ethdev ops structure and pass
control the the low-level device.