From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jesper.wramberg@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lb0-f172.google.com (mail-lb0-f172.google.com
 [209.85.217.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EB8559C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Oct 2015 20:19:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by lbwr8 with SMTP id r8so56040500lbw.2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=5dpRztPH8OnQyG7oCWbtTqo9kM4Y2QkqxO14puJSvYc=;
 b=M9+bx/+lbMdmn+6GWocRtlDG02oO/bY/2z9+1ZbbaFLlsUcGfKONQXL1H7Ujcd2RiT
 pKFtA6oWM3uFI+CpMatAkoC/va8Jh9nhgitI0U3717FBoisEUIbVeafZxi66PPqGoFDN
 loMqOkCsLGIJmK9zRPGX9407K4ijcJqgX4gFIJZNli6bekyX5mZPVuYssbvT2cUhxcGF
 b5QkjvBHMGcohotpAvMGAqfXyJflYLCEWIW9vwoFZPlgXVs1ouTAWGodw6P8UcPGW1/A
 UqHPxJDLDW1qljl3Tebo31xaBAG2baLm3KofpBGQcBJ1gZ92I2udrnYlwTtZVSOYUFVH
 qtnA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.142.203 with SMTP id q194mr2849166lfd.83.1444328351555;
 Thu, 08 Oct 2015 11:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.167.12 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:19:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <j31vm8qeh6m9p8ajwn0db04b.1444318578543@email.android.com>
References: <CALhSPouKsiVrjw-bgzhHGJLLji9BNoOfZqBMz0J_+OLTmr3DWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <j31vm8qeh6m9p8ajwn0db04b.1444318578543@email.android.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:19:11 +0200
Message-ID: <CALhSPouuFFF6WGK_OUaje0u=YnwL-0OvdkN-034mWRxYn9DE=g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jesper Wramberg <jesper.wramberg@gmail.com>
To: Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Segmentation fault when bonding ports on Mellanox
	ConnectX-3
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:19:12 -0000

Hi Olga,

Thank you for your help. I'll check out the patches tomorrow.
For the sake of clarity, I assume you mean the patches about:
"eal: new interrupt handler type"
"mlx4: handle interrupts"
etc.

Regards,
Jesper


2015-10-08 17:36 GMT+02:00 Olga Shern <olgas@mellanox.com>:

>
>
> Hi Jesper,
>
> Bonding pmd is not supported with dpdk 2.1 on Mellanox nic
> We just sent patches to support async link events. Without these patches
> it will  not work.
>
> Best Regards
> Olga
> Sent from Samsung Mobile.
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Jesper Wramberg
> Date:08/10/2015 4:25 PM (GMT+00:00)
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Segmentation fault when bonding ports on Mellanox
> ConnectX-3
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if anyone has any experience with the ConnectX-3 card from
> Mellanox ? I have a server with such a card I can't seem to get link
> bonding to work.
>
> I've installed the necessary kernel modules, etc. and the card works as
> expected when testing it using e.g. the layer 2 forwarding example. If i
> try to run the bond example, however, I get a segmentation fault when the
> "rte_eth_bond_slave_add" function is called. Originally I wanted to bond
> the ports using the EAL cmd line option but the card only has one pci
> address :(
>
> Does anyone have any idea what could be causing this behavior ?
> I am running fw version 2.30.x which I have considered upgrading. Besides
> this I have been wondering if I have to do anything in Linux since the PMD
> uses the Linux drivers for control. I haven't been able to find any
> information on it though.
>
> Regards,
> Jesper Wramberg
>