From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708EA46038; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 21:05:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A44F40FDE; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 21:05:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qk1-f178.google.com (mail-qk1-f178.google.com [209.85.222.178]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C2240FDE for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 9 Jan 2025 21:05:56 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk1-f178.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7b702c3c021so112121285a.3 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:05:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1736453156; x=1737057956; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=bKJOZxLuNO9Wqo/GDC0wep4tU8TnJPrSi36ITijbi8g=; b=3rgVQ3NWC6nFgGliyhaKFw0hmb5nyX8rg0WhUs0i4fSKukM1lUxBq2Zys+hNAjIcua zc5MqCcArG7sEZdknCALr7xCJ9VsUm9Unzrw7Ik6CIhH8vaVoh+i7Gnm6FHpDY46yl3j jwxrAX2ieLK/WSJk1D7kAnYg9WPUr9pgJ72wq3um/7p8MFxentDnzjNgvr/jh1XmXySa AV2KwOIg4jFWkshs200hrOal0FY3GC3FQBs5nzhaptWUyXWgDki/PBlFgotdMT4BRAUB WhalbopKkbMs3JbqIvkxR+uPxAjG3BW61e4pXtZxNignNXR1W/iYdU5OkVrL+qZ/53HS HQ2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1736453156; x=1737057956; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=bKJOZxLuNO9Wqo/GDC0wep4tU8TnJPrSi36ITijbi8g=; b=vInWtBkP3BvC9Oi3RRYS79Jea1vfp48/uiE8nrhSXMOl1i6VgtUq+3bIHpB95QqvtZ bDQShflQynMCnHPpQ/w312fN0KOxruR2X5NfU0todmdMMsV2UPKVxbmonMHmF/qNyZB1 38FKtnsZ/FPzvABXBuQmy6GkSKTGCef3s5eSAMAw19yP0FwL+ofeHwhTgBPFD+o8bu7U AGcV3zB2VLQ1Crx0nuu+LIEB+LV49WQSzcZQkxPYl2kvexrrPX6SUWYFa9r04J9cv+4g psvgMYW6Zkx6hHD3gZEkhZ3TBbIU8KAaYuYeWYWZ43bvVcdGOyDzBd3TVlYpwrN5uJ+h HMCg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz5Imi4TgMG/J1ZNj55gAbccjlT1MGSWqCLFfF9X5hNFY508pLb If8bbXQN4SPTq0M1SWXhzjN0Gg/9jwV+0g7FDkBNLBJXoiiv/F5lFQ64FJqo44LCggAhEFuqLrC tRKsJpJlzDvlhqYYGuNdapyhAIsxWl1iBl0mr X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv/kTpGr91iNlPsPqofXnV5rsYIExTdBvvzJxOC/TmcS8HF27LNUSo33wa3w8u VXDFGrJtCZ1oOTHxbxoBMyR5lvMkunXYeywGlOkKTrKP/RHFdjrgrxF9DDSvUEg1JfCRB X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFACG4DZBhB+VP3J8+A+PJuOfiVXdbItZKxeEBdXxBVCjGYXJN0Jou8+4fjCecxzUhc92BHZwezKB4T9g14Esg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:4721:b0:7b6:d5cb:43b0 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7bcd9759cefmr1091688385a.39.1736453155553; Thu, 09 Jan 2025 12:05:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250107190258.2107909-1-joshwash@google.com> <20250109194638.3262043-1-joshwash@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20250109194638.3262043-1-joshwash@google.com> From: Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 12:05:43 -0800 X-Gm-Features: AbW1kvb0n_cn6G7loixdf_1JtUWvoLS7ui4sigpr_NWGcAVtOM9J1dx-ni-3Lqc Message-ID: <CALuQH+WkxmXH4-SSeRowB_y6fwajom2tpiO2HH5iG5uVfzFqwQ@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net/gve: allocate RX QPL pages using malloc To: Jeroen de Borst <jeroendb@google.com>, Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com>, Joshua Washington <joshwash@google.com>, Xiaoyun Li <xiaoyun.li@intel.com> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Praveen Kaligineedi <pkaligineedi@google.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org> List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe> List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/> List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org> List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help> List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>, <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe> Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hello, I wish for this fix to be backported to stable release 22.11 and 23.11 for DPDK. However, the patch as it is does not apply cleanly to either release. What is the recommended way to include this patch in older releases of DPDK? Should I create separate stable backport patches that apply cleanly to each of the stable releases? Or will this issue be resolved once stable maintainers attempt to apply the patch on older releases? Thanks, Josh