From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BBC64673D; Wed, 14 May 2025 02:46:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043144025D; Wed, 14 May 2025 02:46:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f177.google.com (mail-qk1-f177.google.com [209.85.222.177]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AF0B40041 for ; Wed, 14 May 2025 02:46:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f177.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7c5e2fe5f17so702712285a.3 for ; Tue, 13 May 2025 17:46:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1747183598; x=1747788398; darn=dpdk.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1i76OjTOCaPtG153yLB4L6nzkHIWLmdgZg6Jm2HLJmI=; b=sTtLwLGntbHAj+oC15tHl9CopvBOTtKacl5oSqiXBIT2lZD37ojT5OPPBK7cD5VEDT lkDc77rD+mDgwRgl91JxPrXn7Qn7HDZrYuP5sELQUZfH1ZDZeizfZYHoOTApqqlRsL1M m0s6pUAJ4URsAuedC7JrtY7wZWo+K8NKek0vvjdHk9IpkCHMWm5MUshlhcvG3empMLMR h+fVNeUXvIPLydTtuWZCf8izpHNMAO25WTOJcFV2Bc+8oufRZR0Pw2RSaElFenbiHzZY LBDOXmenMtzx4OMjvx106vk/hsABXE7qNdZsAWgO/xjmP0fno45eCbyfax4Ycu87Qhgu 98Bg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1747183598; x=1747788398; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=1i76OjTOCaPtG153yLB4L6nzkHIWLmdgZg6Jm2HLJmI=; b=b7clHtW5DF3Ivl/FaD0budinU+QDJFgiTDgjOh3yRGzmBSqo3/DU9CsT9cDl6Lv2uN KJ6xDZkUxkpEAxEagzUsX7vhcDkHLgmSkem6JhtMCo/FqvHAvwiwQMvVdyy2B/lc2kiA VhyDveEsKm+7mTU+WFDVTJztUI82Z5HxAohA+0gIAQ7HOR8k73TdXdS6Fs7lDTfnansR 6LZ2xM3n0Rs8mc8H4nXTxH+bmu74JliDGjgeN9fCR7SRw0Pk4fkbkT2mbp5bUIKDuF/l mJt46IVgW2G63IYjn7czfmjSAdPKTiCVOq3RbFjZxLaZ46ZTnLC61Qxn8paIfI9wg7I2 c6fw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yw7EvEUzYVgGrvt0oUaj0P5T0FqJyNVesSxXp25L+d/a0tcy25K 5n4QTZdzITEsbCDR1Mgi/k2EXWT9COyt5bhpAOB+rccC0Rj9YW8b7PK4NlzH6d9NEtMlPNPebUw 3Ch7CmCbnod4DRwUQtGSq8qnWF2U1R7vL/8P9 X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuI8I4nNIMarluiLWSl9qdikkas0IqaFlAEsUnnSE0qJ/aKsH8wUxv9NCoCeJ5 ROYgdOit/uUoPaqr+rX4RqyAU+HxrWZCnd7MVve0CHSfOmL4M0RIW1Uksy0c+rlqYa5ynDsvXj5 b0DQSknwXv8RbeLtg8/0P4reZ9W/2tgIWaojBXX4xFx2GREVBYl0B1BmKLk+hHc3k= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEwxdIlNYCGNR2G5aCCgz7WBMiADIuchxNs8qkfnJBHEYIR+OWp5tbnxGV/WXJAi0d7Bs74xYygsIYU3N/6Ilc= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:2985:b0:7c7:97ff:ca42 with SMTP id af79cd13be357-7cd28856392mr248471785a.41.1747183598313; Tue, 13 May 2025 17:46:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20250513235308.2200865-1-joshwash@google.com> In-Reply-To: <20250513235308.2200865-1-joshwash@google.com> From: Joshua Washington Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 17:46:27 -0700 X-Gm-Features: AX0GCFvatDJugn00i5cDVopfHfxSYLQ8jN0k0KE4smyb7KdJ65H7g1kQi6guxZw Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/gve: remove gve-specific PCI revision ID macros To: Jeroen de Borst , Joshua Washington Cc: dev@dpdk.org, David Marchand Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Patch doesn't apply to the main branch of dpdk-next-net: https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/2025-May/877522.html It seems like the diffbase patch only exists in the for-main branch. When is for-main expected to be merged into main, and should we be building against for-main or main? Similarly, what should this compilation test build against? Thanks, Josh