From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ob0-f170.google.com (mail-ob0-f170.google.com [209.85.214.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAD9E8E7F for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:41:51 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id is5so30447063obc.0 for ; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:41:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=mlKy2IxGVPckdYDngWLkJMoREOUBnn8yx27plronQks=; b=CumzAL1nM2Nqt3ABE7NYhpQ/X3JMBO09oHO4//lxo1o+bv3zmkSkEvLY5E1Sjg7on3 WCoGdN/mzYAjrh4JKVfuJGMoS8GofooUm8S31QeK3Ve10SIhdthcBe5yPrDS802CxYxb K6wTYUMIqTsRnld89P1dSIUpASq7GXhK9KKPr4l4NMF+lSVmXasGQKO5qqmoACpiXNJN wwMTPMqiAEnc+6z4WDYJJ0CFTFJziPLwAFp0+6KVvHZJPBSJQkA8JzP0bDF8wCa+/ZdG qW4mNQ5hqxHLzGDbUBqzidWuPs5p8/jmPKLe8gWnBqGpqal2DkJvekOz1NHp8pg5XLB9 mkyw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=mlKy2IxGVPckdYDngWLkJMoREOUBnn8yx27plronQks=; b=WyXxEBM7WuO5oTN90SDarzTXMCUEwILT82D8zKhcexMnz0E1ysy4qOnuYgQy0CJiZG Asiqpb+U2FOQoscWOldlxin77wP0JgXPTz40IhBOby4AQH0/flzQAPM4XLe7OOlWDypU Hm3PNXl2Xo3AD6QjEaFZGFm6ut8M15MArBMPW758Vqm0wHn6W+DlOIfhAwkxUre8kkVU ZwWI2iaE1nQdASz6s/UPBN0kOplzm0d1mtpGT9iRdJSwtgHNibPwCJbsgvySZQSx0nw+ 2Hynfb0aVTVfBfnCZaqBQlgyXIoLnmVueq3HnPoEXJqaSigS08D0aDGNYtffzeFvdyVs UGDw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkleUCHhO47JJK1KAa4dAvCnUVxppLQl8ZsLfTmuuqHYhtK/Ce90CuMTNMKRrlD3gcgL/lK0CqqWw7KUe76rxlXBuQKhKZMcPLJ6oJbjS0kBGNqZmk= X-Received: by 10.60.79.164 with SMTP id k4mr32738719oex.16.1453369311308; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:41:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.180.72 with HTTP; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 01:41:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1453203972-24855-3-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> References: <1453203972-24855-1-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> <1453203972-24855-3-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com> From: David Marchand Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 10:41:31 +0100 Message-ID: To: Santosh Shukla Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/11] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init() X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 09:41:52 -0000 Hello Santosh, On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Santosh Shukla wrote: > iopl() syscall not supported in linux-arm/arm64 so always return 0 value. > > Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla > Acked-by: Jan Viktorin > Suggested-by: Stephen Hemminger I suppose when we will have more arches, this can be rewritten so that iopl() check is only applied to x86 and all other arches get a 0 return. How about such commit title ? "eal/linux: never check iopl for arm" Regards, -- David Marchand