From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com (mail-wm0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4985587
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  7 Nov 2016 10:02:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id p190so168365442wmp.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 07 Nov 2016 01:02:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=8xV/csmZX26VF8KLgNxGC9ICVW9iEkNXPXDnoZGDCNA=;
 b=rl+fGcn5oX/keOcIvjNz7j47Q7TrhKAKOdOJ/SXCMKnx/zAyDK1O8fF0l2ngQJesTy
 WrStVCbcTjHi1ZY3/HiJeJn1nCzcZIsecoFf6RS0zJgOn72/21GmzqhXTmQ/ekCYGuOP
 RUED6gJeknVqp3WZ/q3CVwjSFPg40hOVByzlDIGqx3ns6fclBK9mvDgjKXEWFYgDDSWj
 w+Z5EV2CQSeDE7DIIyJKLXJqeGfd+ds7VYEbZl6ZAP0vDdRCjJz7xBv0M6lERWE4dTUL
 IZEU0hHKKedo4KbhHRtdZmNllcvFKwIWK5oPXZtKrsp/h24bhRVTSN3moUkTr0LWsUnT
 eJKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=8xV/csmZX26VF8KLgNxGC9ICVW9iEkNXPXDnoZGDCNA=;
 b=eWH1AG0wLddSgYmg7PNKsw5/CXH8rPRVW9sFS/d1t0RIpFhi8g37EQCrXnX9Qx43w3
 ri4zqgj+FM/j6pTW4xOECxdIiTgkYfhSB3rJpc1jmp/rGq3JcwWv55Tug87hM+pjeh9X
 7KRTI4Na/7T4PNZt1GOxcDAwecFfrGUsM4pPa36dJqQPmYY4E2pwuIMGYmOCU53hclZ9
 54WwTz3xmpLrWLBkoOXxHuh81+eYVf5qLAOCQ81/7Ub6qT/UMdZUhkUc7cHgtdvUXlYM
 cvJWDzGRq3+2XhnOBd1wlkkopmISdXC85jGCp9BhKu5pDawbifCKe45xlffdHBow1+Jp
 2nDg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngve64TmMaAOdx/EnezQp4M85/jnWGF98KFgO/M02mZGZ+z51kgPauhqCwq4b3KS17bc+rVO3RTAEKhWhjrT5
X-Received: by 10.194.126.38 with SMTP id mv6mr4416290wjb.142.1478509357011;
 Mon, 07 Nov 2016 01:02:37 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.188.6 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 01:02:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20538590.K61FAlGikS@xps13>
References: <1477432240-20406-1-git-send-email-benjamin.walker@intel.com>
 <20538590.K61FAlGikS@xps13>
From: David Marchand <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:02:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CALwxeUtOT1TCaevHwx8kSdEqHd4b5VO1ER2n0Xym94mWvObm_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: Don't call probe callback if driver
 already loaded.
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 09:02:37 -0000

Hello Thomas,
On Sun, Nov 6, 2016 at 10:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon
<thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:

> 2016-10-25 14:50, Ben Walker:
>> If the user asks to probe multiple times, the probe
>> callback should only be called on devices that don't have
>> a driver already loaded.
>>
>> This is useful if a driver is registered after the
>> execution of a program has started and the list of devices
>> needs to be re-scanned.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Walker <benjamin.walker@intel.com>
>
> Applied, thanks

Can you add a follow up patch I will send shortly ?
Thanks.


-- 
David Marchand