From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-f42.google.com (mail-wr1-f42.google.com [209.85.221.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190986CD8 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:02:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f42.google.com with SMTP id l9so21125147wrt.13 for ; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 13:02:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=p7H6DtDY5oExJCiCVPQqVGhCXbXA+xC8KUnwix3bO/c=; b=hj00EUjeU9fqQnmcA+4JdupiZdfbNJKN6Kx9d4bfo2flQ4GVByOXC2E1WYhMFrip7v BNxPKRRjzFYE0qJqEZA0Zw+yk69SLGecjW+7ZJNI0dDnKf1h5KkXaSeiDM6snXkIYob7 /kiLmNCw5qPbdFbsJwT8I+wMQhMK//abtqd83BthHykeKk6N/GXE9oZcuY+bQCO76Xid kczaRnw+oxZeoXE2+DMEBnL/P4TY9XHjevo+GiEpgqraPBKDtAxZ4xispQGTO+kVRMKl WjfoQUPLDUUBDj365qR/VWBtAghsVaUaYcCTA7l/1WQ38RTq67yLvm4eKCGX1h6Yzjhr aT3w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p7H6DtDY5oExJCiCVPQqVGhCXbXA+xC8KUnwix3bO/c=; b=aUprGGOrgn5PLCukZpjOB+bFif8JnK5jfCFKOLNGtghsW+5UPDEjksDsUe+DS4N/50 YJCOrvO6T5jCO3HZ33uvB+7+y7gGEIHMCJPzkm03/dQLxokkC3bK2FmLNk+8HUgsRp8A KnaRa0JHN+8obnOt4BbP9UhcabFtNU1pwddn9TyhA64NLzaK48idR8ZcTgl/USYJB9Ri p2b8m/MyQtXWljFsns38WyLav7dtL32zMddewwzeiiiGwJF6fTeGQNahNdrnVTysojbH egowp1c0Bba1lBfkRIoIL8Xl+xmWNLdYsFJCe42GSWgThghAoS860iwSvG3QjbOqLxnl qN4w== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbvcTyQQr7CJMrDWdinQUYagL22FCifUYdmnF0GXfugBzBbbae4 xdudVsCaDn8kOD5hGkboO4zXxM+OwFQOe1ZcW1Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/Welxy0xfnejxFk4XzZynR/f/6+q92Pt6xPIVUJXbISmwy64EEDx8NrpAn8ri+/1+Bp6GF5D1pp0FxZ0XfsTRs= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:6b81:: with SMTP id n1mr24879433wrx.149.1544043744457; Wed, 05 Dec 2018 13:02:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1f580105-4110-703c-07aa-9548b8cc543a@intel.com> <94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E01321F305B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <94479800C636CB44BD422CB454846E01321F305B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> From: EJ Raymond Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:02:13 -0500 Message-ID: To: beilei.xing@intel.com Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Bypass support in the i40e PMD driver X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 21:02:25 -0000 Hi, Just wondering if there's any change in status of this topic? I can currently access bypass support for this card in the Silicom utility driver, but have no access in the current DPDK-18.11.0. Will there be support similar to the 82599 bypass API in the future? Thanks, EJ On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 2:15 AM Xing, Beilei wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Yigit, Ferruh > > Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2018 4:42 AM > > To: EJ Raymond ; dev@dpdk.org > > Cc: Xing, Beilei ; Zhang, Qi Z < > qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; > > Zhang, Helin > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Bypass support in the i40e PMD driver > > > > On 7/20/2018 7:39 PM, EJ Raymond wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'm currently working with the PE310G4BPI71 Bypass card from Silicom, > > > Inc., This board is based on the i40E chip (Intel X710 - Fortville). > > > In DPDK, this card makes use of the i40e PMD driver, and I've noticed > > > that bypass configuration is only supported in the IXGBE PMD driver > > > today. Can anyone say if there'll be support for configuring the > > > various bypass modes and watchdog timer in the librte_pmd_i40e driver > in > > the future? > > > > cc'ed i40e maintainers. > > > > Sorry I didn't hear anything about i40e bypass related currently. > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > EJ > > > > >