From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f54.google.com (mail-oi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637908DED for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 15:10:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by oiao187 with SMTP id o187so34190248oia.3 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 07:10:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=my9NFJbUHzdoj4my8D/y751aUzJWCBOmtONrFeajelM=; b=Fib12gI4IHSk+yY/acdx6IoPGYuRuEc+GeCG6h7Rouygxy1l3De2QHHf5LxL1R0Y53 E0CVnUni08+NgW/UX9yLRLM0mNNFpnxfhdo2gn+pX78pYFyfFUeMBCMksqcY9SsOiaZq arLnsFEzSK96srzfpn6HSIPApFjQZIJYRmcpvzTCVSzNGd1hJNAEnLPmiVbsdAFkPq55 2IY79kcLLz6eumeKUI5SO/mzSdXIaUI8RSvc4DaAI613Uuwkq/PFpjB15cfJyBoSZDQi RUlOfQPT8NMfar+sou/6SFw8D/peyyi5XiXS40T80Lkau5tjDkvdo879gL7ATWn6JaOk 8AYw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.79.6 with SMTP id d6mr1111624oib.13.1446127829243; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 07:10:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.175.72 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Oct 2015 07:10:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <14919853.N7JUKnnn3e@xps13> References: <1443606022-13581-2-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com> <1535165.DJM3Z0EPLK@xps13> <14919853.N7JUKnnn3e@xps13> Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 10:10:29 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kyle Larose To: Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/11] Port XStats X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 14:10:30 -0000 On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > So what is missing currently? Just having a consistent naming of > similar counters? A consistent naming scheme would certainly solve the problem. Thanks again, Kyle