From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oi0-f51.google.com (mail-oi0-f51.google.com [209.85.218.51]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38853C36E for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 19:13:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by oiww189 with SMTP id w189so54037624oiw.3 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:13:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=7tmTQmnbxf6nj2nfbyvJS8P6Z4m9uT5u1UpZMYLdaXg=; b=Q3Mc5IWDGotgPflIUG4ZFqjz2bjMUQtfkdtIRJYShg2vrq7eaq/nsQAV9XPw3zN4Lu P1XYn3a9ifvw+HsaEFvZ7a3FHdi6/gTVsSUKjBOZyN7cZrFabSEhAgK9wSEKBxQERV8z E4JAWtDVtm4x7rBm6F1h4pL5ig8n5YJS9GvtDI8dPNR5hAxpdFvGhodakyBupECXVdeB onDpTrcM4JFbpv1mbLiEzfhRTBgih7k1sJ5zxS2qHXsMXsinqFKxjFedA3iR8CcEoc0f e+BcJopxHqB8VfJhg+HhskLLX4wm+2fVvCq8rG6GWFpujsQFm/1MXIOEHkebEPW4sI+9 fwEw== X-Received: by 10.202.45.206 with SMTP id t197mr12923743oit.110.1447438436683; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:13:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.41.39 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 10:13:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2584503.Vl16qpNLEm@xps13> References: <2584503.Vl16qpNLEm@xps13> From: Aws Ismail Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 13:13:37 -0500 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] support for X552/X557-AT 10GBase-T devices X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 18:13:57 -0000 On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-11-13 11:32, Aws Ismail: >> I just wanted to confirm whether the 0x15ad X552/X557-AT 10GBase-T >> devices are currently "fully" supported by DPDK (master). > > My understanding is that it is supported: > http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/commit/?id=2e83c81bad > (but you can have a hint in the last letters of the commit id ;) > Thanks Thomas for the reply, :) I would agree on that. It seems to me support is just experimental for now. >> I have looked at the ixgbe PMD code and I can see 0x15AD being >> mentioned in the device list but I am unable to fully use it even with >> the testpmd app. > > So I think you can send a bug report on this list. Is there a process to file a bug? on the dev page (http://dpdk.org/dev) there is no mention about how to send in a bug report. Is there a bugzilla page for DPDK somewhere? > >> I understand that the 0x15ad devices are not yet fully supported in >> the mainline kernel (even in 4.3.x) as of yet, but I wonder if the PMD >> usually lags behind the mainline driver. > > There is no rule and really often they are not written by the same developpers.