From: Alex Kiselev <kiselev99@gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] release/acquire memory barriers and ring
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2018 22:37:37 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMKNYbw7=b69eCM17p8SperLRD86wtKw3iLj1FtG8gL7bUakNg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi.
I've been wondering should I use a release/acquire memory barrier pair
in order to be sure that the other thread will see the fully/corrected
initialized object
passed to it via a dpdk ring or ring itself is a kind of barrier?
Let's say I have a pseudo code:
Thread1:
obj = alloc();
...
obj initialization
...
??? fence(memory_order_release); ???
rte_ring_sp_enqueue(ring, obj)
Thread2:
??? fence(memory_order_acquire); ???
rte_ring_sc_dequeue(ring, obj)
Should I use fences in that code?
Thanks.
--
Alex
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-13 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-13 19:37 Alex Kiselev [this message]
2018-02-13 19:43 ` Alex Kiselev
2018-02-16 17:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-02-17 13:59 ` Burakov, Anatoly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMKNYbw7=b69eCM17p8SperLRD86wtKw3iLj1FtG8gL7bUakNg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=kiselev99@gmail.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).