From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dror.birkman@lightcyber.com>
Received: from mail-qt0-f182.google.com (mail-qt0-f182.google.com
 [209.85.216.182]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAC12C10
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:14:09 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-qt0-f182.google.com with SMTP id l91so60722363qte.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 04:14:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=lightcyber-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=BTp8/VCvGwMEDhwXZqrh6VRIfMAt8pQLKMpzOOMB1+M=;
 b=G+DiTANTfgo2S1UkGWNpCKEo4nHqrlax3460Kwc38LJFSna4g69G36vi6cXQzxmWxV
 D9UfQQkFauy2/jSPwR98vLWEzEefvhYuDWMnEGbTjxbiunOow+x/MEkKXxQx9DMbv8yA
 CZzf2lLPHbWCzUVxmcGIg3IohCmlXB9CBvZ/LRUEhIh735bdcJdErtJEuHNLFFsHJdNS
 yIl3oqfQFPCyf1/rOUNE42BCdROteh8q6Up32HKgZzVPbaMphcTEV1bBfnMMAF9U84As
 ENJHy9XdtCQJvV4lV4NQNdT8XKLeKevDvBe+g58ptVmSNytKfm28y9X5uHSpMfZsJDr5
 FopQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=BTp8/VCvGwMEDhwXZqrh6VRIfMAt8pQLKMpzOOMB1+M=;
 b=icoU77lqBmUFugO5ytBaY/IWTZZocai0JzvdW3xuv8MZbKbuBKyIW/dnU7uUnjsLzJ
 OxFJgPau38n40CTkg2LzypVRE9fforCZ8fU5wJkom9wTqjpixPhWn7CTlOreLPWVo2+e
 1sPqxBTkK8/hk56kysTqv8QSM8qzo2HOWxvwO8qiKhIEscBrsfK6krpRtcmK8K7KxXUa
 Fop/GNzuGzPM13s0+EeYX6JYQnWt0FUV8noKyRVwSf+Cyr9AhIXZ6P+Xa4UEmxkBpWjR
 2Jqs74GEzj4vujeAkAJgf9IgxpDdzSyFNRh6PDVdWe2FB5S7fUJV7CAM+pjNr6wzilIQ
 WczQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMxTMIc0GTaiVSaqPQuZtW/mWCBJwdYiaiFJkKs0Ac+EbKSwshCkCLEi/rXKa6o3GNY1HFzNSZNCBcjEQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.52.124 with SMTP id v57mr23745278qtb.137.1474197248869; 
 Sun, 18 Sep 2016 04:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.101.21 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2016 04:14:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dror Birkman <dror.birkman@lightcyber.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:14:08 +0300
Message-ID: <CAMLkaUsbhUZg16PY1jkvvU7BTWXL7Q0sKu=h3RzbThBi8oZv1Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] pcap: memory leak in eth_pcap_rx_jumbo
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 11:14:09 -0000

Hi,

It seems there is a memory leak in eth_pcap_rx_jumbo() in
case rte_pktmbuf_alloc() fails on any segment that is not the initial
segment.

If someone can confirm it, I'll patch it.

TIA,
Dror