From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DDAC4305E; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:12:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5741410F1; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:12:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f176.google.com (mail-qt1-f176.google.com [209.85.160.176]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B390241144 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:12:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f176.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-40f0b412b78so32274401cf.3 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 01:12:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1692000720; x=1692605520; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=YwDtrtAbGaTjtSkaTzYgW21LRYEb2EPRqSkfV3cAfzQ=; b=XHjJIYx6MH3pputO01RK8BUZtyaIyq0V7GuIl12o/70Ws4yPIS6uRMYzNeV4IA+VJe MbEgTXWRr8zfFqk+eTUnGPDfpuPkNFZI/RKllVolF+fGF094Jz0mN/TaaIPEewwQnd3w mj/sKdhA7f++pCYxawbcKmSrCRGtzIl1sGWBcrLBkOerRPlx2Z4OTJzQpsBY4SZnc0N8 nD7qfsSgiHbpmwiR9+xgNXhr/PHo4vC14ehzfk6Ot6nL6rdXujn3SsB6Yf1Bi4J1ILml /tBXmVVNs7NcOw/BEkJHXT5RXjknp06vDGGVV5Lzs3uje8G6IOMrYhCjXpKjmnU3kk9y rv8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1692000720; x=1692605520; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=YwDtrtAbGaTjtSkaTzYgW21LRYEb2EPRqSkfV3cAfzQ=; b=SVYhz5SiP7oRKwnj0MKfeSSnWHBpXGLYnSmN/VmOez6VGKTK7aNRmFTSmaLLd0jDyM 1PPP1hJ2WZaYQyPNvJpXVXXlWpQJ746wRLLmLVfMMVTJRtNQqQiVi9ZPOwCkmDq96V2K IKk3Yb61AuzIEQ/wO+1hlBPf4LypAHEKyrt0C6H+ewlmS6pD0hBk/SjQ7lVBtCg3EaJ/ zGCiJP//81KxIo8lv8TjwZ953HYWzbfWnzephypaTUbvXROFzOCl/npSJZwzumPGIwc0 gcrzjUhX+/l37xX6f54THci1pryP5yuzdf/TPXjGgKav3CQSEhgxLiZj4X3Gv3sr0Jdb pvWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yy82lhctClowb2Mq8h7YUqBn213XejfDsArbARcCIvEg4RZRIfB iz/EL3UvjkXB9AesmcKeyBdi14yqfwPl6hZUpBY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGSA3TP/u12ZA33xJN0oHMhNSgmjRlzNX7JypGMlHf1ZnY/Bm7TxlpJZIYB04Cloqwq3q9Mrh3BFI0XnOnJYnk= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:5e51:0:b0:406:9427:a424 with SMTP id i17-20020ac85e51000000b004069427a424mr12225806qtx.14.1692000720072; Mon, 14 Aug 2023 01:12:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200417072254.11455-1-nithind1988@gmail.com> <2235168.3ZeAukHxDK@thomas> In-Reply-To: <2235168.3ZeAukHxDK@thomas> From: Nithin Dabilpuram Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:41:46 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] mbuf: add Tx offloads for packet marking To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: jerinj@marvell.com, Nithin Dabilpuram , ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com, orika@mellanox.com, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic , Olivier Matz , dev@dpdk.org, kkanas@marvell.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org At last it was suggested to use dynamic ol_flags in mbuf for this feature. We decided to postpone this since it effects our fast path performance. You can remove it from the roadmap. Thanks Nithin On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 6:24=E2=80=AFPM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > Please can you remind what was decided for this feature? > I think I should remove it from the roadmap. > > > 17/04/2020 09:22, Nithin Dabilpuram: > > From: Nithin Dabilpuram > > > > Introduce PKT_TX_MARK_IP_DSCP, PKT_TX_MARK_IP_ECN > > and PKT_TX_MARK_VLAN_DEI Tx offload flags to support > > packet marking. > > > > When packet marking feature in Traffic manager is enabled, > > application has to the use the three new flags to indicate > > to PMD on whether packet marking needs to be enabled on the > > specific mbuf or not. By setting the three flags, it is > > assumed by PMD that application has already verified the > > applicability of marking on that specific packet and > > PMD need not perform further checks as per RFC. > > > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kanas > > Signed-off-by: Nithin Dabilpuram > > > > >