From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A5DB45BAA; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:54:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3B4402E1; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:54:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f169.google.com (mail-qt1-f169.google.com [209.85.160.169]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FF4D4026C for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 06:54:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-4609beb631aso48652591cf.2 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:54:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1729659281; x=1730264081; darn=dpdk.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Uv8Ac5Zdt3H0XR1cqgH2SYr9iwFYgQws33P6L7bVlVE=; b=m/tlkn0qrPm+9M9WhVlYzl+uQNf4jxN2DAkDMOIZhv9X1Q6ziWNpzb7EJsILBfXclg N4RSWzfieDjffOmng44gobc/EHKL/q1f+q0adMaRpbJmRU2PCkeFse9MnTwz/FRTtMm8 0WBzAYLp8p1e5q2fG/pDaRCagPhYjfE73M54PFy9HvUB/9j7iPfvkTF9q8SfBwHjfb08 9jRKnyWgcHjekDdgjMyZstscUvmj5LBBeDMu54RB6IGt12JJ4xUiG1g/6vYUHilPdKAR 1pA+7y7mouOYBU9kwAlqqakqaCVdAXikMgRt3iR6M+YmkbAEZvmY7/nWgsnMQC6wGVYJ YwgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1729659281; x=1730264081; h=content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Uv8Ac5Zdt3H0XR1cqgH2SYr9iwFYgQws33P6L7bVlVE=; b=U33gz7ZrYMXG0x+Dvl240okBF87dA2vQihqJlkXvuH2yDeKhzcZVwbouhQJO1/TTdr e+E69Do8c4X2634OjdYksmTgRci8GyRkSJzLeAkFzcSYanFrkJfu+fqpx1DMFqIugTZS qlysgdmnhrIF6ZA/VtEyWrl4jpswPYKJRFE6D0IZpdguzEiAflMst8LtjlaxCNa/0H23 e9IknvWy0BabstsqPILYaRakZc5tqsDccACv5bgN0gnQvDn0T0LOv7pe62rbsOblUhHH wID1XZg+oiZgs96OCP07xroFwpewbAQJEAL4S6cD2aHLKyUcgT2ZLsFuD+lE4RbcZ0NL miWA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXPN7vhVdUjAvHfztnJnkvh2JIQuwLxTx/CrO4Sm7Q5vepl3prMAeXJPZSD6e4DOV13Y3w=@dpdk.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx87SNqeJlCRsqCnsHk37v8FAS0eF2G8oxawYG1qLKHd1yGbb89 WZDpbxOG0xEfuVunlqYkav+soqK5ThWcQmfSNf32u7mPDBCnYIoHVikAyEN8iPe8VfmNA4eQI5E jOmHaOBYWFT61oQ9bkiUX4aQinek= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFzve1nsCi15QKBHkaW5NbE+DZu1QY27/bbsKPC6JRolEJSqwDtFab62u1PDWIusBlSuEFqFdXyx/YONfZWMes= X-Received: by 2002:a05:622a:14c8:b0:460:9b87:b4a8 with SMTP id d75a77b69052e-46114743a79mr16398471cf.39.1729659280895; Tue, 22 Oct 2024 21:54:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20240822153218.3782170-1-akozyrev@nvidia.com> In-Reply-To: From: Nithin Dabilpuram Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 10:24:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] mbuf: add transport mode ESP packet type To: Alexander Kozyrev Cc: David Marchand , "dev@dpdk.org" , Dariusz Sosnowski , Ori Kam , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" , Matan Azrad , "jerinj@marvell.com" , "rbhansali@marvell.com" , "ferruh.yigit@amd.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org >And we definitely need RTE_PTYPE_INNER_L4_ESP for ESP over UDP support. Isn't this already taken care when mbuf->packet_type =3D (RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP | RTE_PTYPE_TUNNEL_ESP) ? On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 6:49=E2=80=AFPM Alexander Kozyrev wrote: > > > I am curious, where is the driver that implements this? > I'll send MLX5 implementation shortly.