From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE9CA0588;
	Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:47:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A3E011A2;
	Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:47:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-ot1-f47.google.com (mail-ot1-f47.google.com
 [209.85.210.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE76F94
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 19:47:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-ot1-f47.google.com with SMTP id r2so9396515otn.6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:47:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=F3YDUGKbMN8mlkhiVMRj3gTp3F1T0gD5jKfkFnW/NO0=;
 b=c1XObvdCZQ0mog5amKgoA8uDRk08bzsbVZ2AZYiVpFICXPq5olpCA9CE5YhS5EomBb
 nNqQ8ls8pyyVioVDQJAX/kcfITLxLgxOIgIu+ZOWgATifR8BJsEwl+CAgLzgr80gJBjG
 ACzSqmyzRf/KICyDsxpKnWnILkNqb2T4VEOYgiVHCgY31JQnTWWEjWTb6B4IEXDQgySQ
 twpuBwyCvCgZFvOhJogoOYENYSuXRh3l/wp/tUBk+wtleaOvWqhoZUMXxUWukbJVIRvg
 GT5giKG9I4DGlNP2Jjcra5CI0DZtiJyWk80R2LaI39RzRbXYBjRGPk2Dw/Tv/O5sRfR2
 +jKg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=F3YDUGKbMN8mlkhiVMRj3gTp3F1T0gD5jKfkFnW/NO0=;
 b=rAs+LfsShE5DdX9b73fBgjzttUDNzZLSFzowTg1G1so+MJ4rFDjIFQGgG9Op1SSWof
 IKH6hVvrq4TBGCgMqah7+muZYY7K2tPTmswH1NouBJ1Zm3YwZSgELWDXpB4aoyKjSwla
 8BKZ3yJndm6CUVeUbYMc8Ws41Y1FLQtzD5bSTL9Io/kTuOyiwyGG5qQKcz3e2GCrll9K
 OtNphYyRcMxRt0W+tWfklGECKlAfUr5hxfwvsDMOeDHQADLPCmiGnn0hVJcm5WgZ0g3R
 OegdUljXHPjy/qAuPhYDbEdoKHp3Lh4G0XVUHe7XnBWpjTLm5TgBskcswT4plz7VtxKl
 3Ieg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ08g5dRLCoYFlSqbNkAiMgozLg1O22flaG6CtYQuGf5KEX7Kzom
 SQUFzZWkOr+/1N5L0KMq1F7gqJcjyDNuRwjfUsUPlg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtC0RAG4rkKV8GD5RFxJFkWMb/nVsCnbgVI4XMtmUB8Gt2iszjlQVFyULiwMf7F8NwKd40DIbZ949b4KR7ukxI=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:5f7:: with SMTP id 110mr10980189otd.73.1584816454985; 
 Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:47:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Adel Belkhiri <adel.belkhiri@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 14:47:22 -0400
Message-ID: <CAMxxxdP3_FkNpi-c9Eq4z7B_1w9FcsvttVo_XMaH1OX4zBcH1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Exporting DPDK network interfaces statistics
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hello guys,

I'm trying to develop a monitoring tool capable of exporting some
statistics about DPDK network interfaces. The problem with spawning a
"secondary process", the way proc-info does, is that not all the network
interfaces are "seen" but just those managed by a single primary process.

I was wondering if there is another way to implement this without spawning
many processes.

Thank you.

Adel.