From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68122A0C4D; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:38:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF0540151; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:38:19 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-lf1-f54.google.com (mail-lf1-f54.google.com [209.85.167.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC5440042; Fri, 13 Aug 2021 00:32:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-lf1-f54.google.com with SMTP id t9so16359538lfc.6; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:32:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bLEcXLmC1gapE5NEXukuhEUkRdpahzsUZQlBs/cWr8o=; b=O6HDek7HazNCA9cSgmbmlEOjhNvYfXlC79wC+1YDMMrY54RXzoU7nBV4D/Nc0zCOg9 OZ1OmEO0qLjQjvskuCOuiVXB0FJCeTI3JH8zSMsJ0oEyiLtAQxHmpmq+MWwE1QXHbxKK e8mAZXscCmkME2xj1/tSciRVMIMj9RMfxGDB7ocK0WwIL6aCcdFCgCQE8ppK5zwhDsbL LEn2HFsrtTB0fV3VJMj4quNRPJdavU6K65eDlR1t5yQrsgJNhs06h4mTL+A/XUgjTgEq vBWqzLUOl60TJuGL4EHMXgNr0SmQCfmI/9M5ciWOUSHm4YCHNDl3Vo1gPcMmX7K94+qu r2gw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bLEcXLmC1gapE5NEXukuhEUkRdpahzsUZQlBs/cWr8o=; b=s918+byVIqrHMD9P5gQMPXf9iheLOp+ybCFqAKYcSsd8InU2cUuKbWFFeivxDws4p9 h5V+jOrq/pioqb65399iZm10TVLRZh4eQ85DLGYiGnKP/qvb1uyCRmYHuBJbkQxbCFCx DjmKY+6RLmvBZ44eOZcvC4+5M1J0O/2K5TOofX1SufBktluQSEvqwQEhDWYbBZLUcq8q SP31PiwYTVaKm488uh0LIScltDKafRHc19egHErd0WF6cSKUicV//js4zA1PqT66MskZ Mu4gbz9UXt98KYHqdTW8MmKIjr2+ug6vcq6dCZIp98AxW/JVHQfEPBU2N8XRql4JAUE0 LbXQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533p2UTi5WUJPSZXAj15+J7VxmJ33+bX2Q8cWPxR7Z6mUM/FY965 CDwnbwxJ7Cwq5fxshW0rbsKew+6b9hiGNTJWoxtx0aQOqsY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw0Eqsjg7AntpTOFsy5Af9kQPBuobqnWkC4WFTW+BXRXZZuRKGgujKJBqwefv0B0n6fYYfffdK40/ThHzg25hw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:70f:: with SMTP id b15mr1769119lfs.257.1628807578580; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 15:32:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Thao Hull Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 18:32:22 -0400 Message-ID: To: dev@dpdk.org, szymon.mikulicz@nokia.com, users@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 13 Aug 2021 09:38:17 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: [dpdk-dev] EAL: failed to parse device "XX:XX.X" on CentOS 7 X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi. This looks similar to the problem I am having. https://lore.kernel.org/dpdk-dev/bug-689-3@http.bugs.dpdk.org%2F/T/ I can't figure out how this issue was resolved on Centos7 per the thread. Can someone please explain how to get past this failure error? Just like this user, testpmd works fine for me. My device is in slot b3:00.0. I am using arkville on a bittware FPGA card. My error is slightly different as shown below: EAL: Detected 24 lcore(s) EAL: Detected 2 NUMA nodes EAL: Detected static linkage of DPDK EAL: failed to parse device "b3:00.0" EAL: Unable to parse device 'b3:00.0, Pkt_dir=0xF0000, Pkt_gen=./pg.conf' EAL: Error - exiting with EAL initialization I'm using dpdk version 21.08.0 Any thoughts on how to debug, if not fix this? I am new to dpdk. Thank you! Thao