From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <tnakamura.dpdk@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-oi0-f66.google.com (mail-oi0-f66.google.com
 [209.85.218.66]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ABF293B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  7 Dec 2017 13:34:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-oi0-f66.google.com with SMTP id j17so4805696oih.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 07 Dec 2017 04:34:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=gVMcrBf72sTvoFFOBCa5f9n79dU68XC6I09D5ozkTm0=;
 b=hC61Sg78ltw7qox20iraS+SacCrDulH/Tsqo5sNtwphFaTPRvhCv4KhC/ivc04KQb7
 Q6MxnqR3dcnkTPL3A2gIwLrw5ioClo//qRbTRansFtvvDlzm0mWFzZCbuFaeFE25puIM
 q9vC35uwqqxvcyRPkOkp4xh0nNrK95I37sx60U5CEj7LBJFD5zFe545PHnZ7jiLNnHtg
 oLX8ccXKEq0PeotOAxBSIsmo4gczs1BqIzFo+6JVU60/fzwMWtKvfMxaICiHCyCtQWzF
 WLbsXT05rQN9M5IHct36ZT4Fj0Vxmi2Xh1647e2ADW1NRh3Z+1Q8u0om5gn9hqwUavUw
 ysgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=gVMcrBf72sTvoFFOBCa5f9n79dU68XC6I09D5ozkTm0=;
 b=pPjbjGQyGnBdklxdVmdLxjhs2VbuDYMav5hLy7ueSpzYbyzt7kywKDlpN13DS9Uxz3
 4LkF8T8Ez3DuO4VH5k8V9NdrasQ0YFxHtL+yn6YFLQfKyhqlrqDunQ5AbapV4uYSgZLA
 Or1P8dXD3veK7a38heE4IXEN/tlMncG4mZdnuAThDEwIoiTNA4c4yfbesCg9wLmOVCwa
 nLUCUwXQIuPHORzzcZLcL8Hyqx7jMhUM3ROf8wVI5g+AQkLY1rPzRMrAHe1phpgrCQYx
 Fvdey0geY2xlPgIELZe6wZWsQpztyfJZKcduj2OgcXgYXruJ968tbspzmm2i+SubQQfD
 TI/A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX49FnUSW2nq9DNGJ+oDJ43lHQv1xv7I4iUosRL6Wj9ZT16NfI33
 A1Zp+WQHwhsXCmOvyyDbI/p1xgfCTD5rto1KHdphPA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaygar3GJGDGYKRjym9d8p9Ksg0vrwc3/RYK6nA9qv0oo8CpzBqyrquhPyTIX3BIrye9p3IJK6RjHrFj7q3/Ls=
X-Received: by 10.202.207.151 with SMTP id f145mr22726826oig.348.1512650085431; 
 Thu, 07 Dec 2017 04:34:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.58.37 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 04:34:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Tetsuro Nakamura <tnakamura.dpdk@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:34:44 +0900
Message-ID: <CANc6esgowty4nEYGqXAP-yDmdB+jvKdrYcHhaYhQkdOE84er8A@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org, nakamura.tetsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] document for rte_flow
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 12:34:47 -0000

Hi all,

Thanks to the document Zhao Wei-san sent to me the other day,
I could evaluate the L2 switching performance with Generic flow API,
with "Intel X552 NIC (10G)".

Now I am very interested in what happens with the performance
with my Intel "XL710 NIC (40G)"  and "Intel XXV710 (25G)".

So my question is that,
Is there the same rte_flow document for these NICs just as we as ixgbe NICs
that is attached to this email as a word file?

If there is one. I really would like you to send me one.

Thanks in advance,

Tetsuro Nakamura