From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-qk0-f181.google.com (mail-qk0-f181.google.com [209.85.220.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFF0558B for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:40:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk0-f181.google.com with SMTP id x190so19211933qkb.0 for ; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 06:40:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semihalf-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=izeufsPS05Z8qrd6eD9vML8kyDOWfz+FUIprTx6GcRU=; b=gyk/HzTER2FEsX4gsgsz/MOEbD+igml8zY17+2KcrU9gQpoA6pIZ2J3bMPwfItdhhv PKKM8FGYsjV0vDSjMfxl3u8UJeX1DCa1yyyC6cVkMQuhVaU+AX2asxqAObCf3OEkbb6E dtM3DAl+JGWgXOeVPTD3zxh6W4fONn3wDRTt+QiNoL2EE/EyInQQSwzCaQhfmO1qD2Y2 dHPMKErtVdDm/sxp8xCZQ+lTzJhkbEJzTqIBdJJwfDaYzDQdIjr4MGUjWtM8SBPWUdUq cF9kFBP0e9hUmM/C1fgJ9ncZLcvqtPfEHNaIGOCfYxurK97Jo7eIN19d+XfzQklViinC 7aFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=izeufsPS05Z8qrd6eD9vML8kyDOWfz+FUIprTx6GcRU=; b=VnqG6gwv6BxTkHCzOyD6C3P1VfNI+w7lQKDnZyPDRT1sGLsBQIJjnPccsF77ru2sgh FjTeVjjvYaeu+PJEapR/ose3CC9q5NspnEuogkmDQSXvGxiy0GvzIxRTs3hbyd86v699 /7TMnBURuzgvtqss3qL/lUQamLf7fMadGq9MGxDdLbkaBUiu+NgV1ZgOIZZqFoG/OI6z LE46rnVGzp+XE54Et+gVtj1Vc6dE5yPnVf8WbC1LXhTU2YCeXQrOS4qrEb2iXJWvRPuK yteelg4OgBBPhUlpIMFtkFENRFZunz8u3/u0D3nG2tREA3dfYC97EyLey5leOs+6qrpm J/KA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC028rYVubK6sHzstmzCgCFthXmNgXpAIQg02//TBq4TxSRLm7HAclX/6t8ydjyIo4QpPVl+SvMNd8YifBg== X-Received: by 10.55.9.143 with SMTP id 137mr65938798qkj.250.1481294441251; Fri, 09 Dec 2016 06:40:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.147.70 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Dec 2016 06:40:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1477486575-25148-1-git-send-email-tomaszx.kulasek@intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E2444@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <3517413.XL3bTbAyaC@xps13> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E3B03@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> <8b0acf96-cba9-6c91-92c4-93674052e995@intel.com> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772583F0E4E05@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jan_M=C4=99dala?= Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2016 15:40:40 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Yigit, Ferruh" Cc: "Ananyev, Konstantin" , Thomas Monjalon , Harish Patil , "dev@dpdk.org" , Rahul Lakkireddy , Stephen Hurd , Jakub Palider , John Daley , Adrien Mazarguil , Alejandro Lucero , Rasesh Mody , "Jacob, Jerin" , Yuanhan Liu , "Kulasek, TomaszX" , "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , Yong Wang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 0/6] add Tx preparation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2016 14:40:42 -0000 Hello, Sorry for late response. >>From ENA perspective, we need to dig deeper about the requirements and use cases, but I'm pretty confident (95%) that ena will need to implement tx_prep() API. There is at least one scenario, when HW relay on partial checksum. Jan