From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362204293B; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:18:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1400B42D0D; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:18:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ua1-f46.google.com (mail-ua1-f46.google.com [209.85.222.46]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A923A400D5 for ; Fri, 14 Apr 2023 07:18:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ua1-f46.google.com with SMTP id a38so11118493uax.12 for ; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 22:18:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1681449486; x=1684041486; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=1fKfSxhlkAytD1rBjULhwpAKXv+7tPEkQdemvQfacXw=; b=KiUqsR40Ryl5O8bH4IMFCF+u3lmnOViAAwfRLaT4M7R1vosfkxS+FUYjcmtsqiQ1PZ tjdu8ovzoQS4KUVDCzeu4MlDALxow/YE0f0prCaLT7MOZHSB+hA+DUz0rHrz5aYbaoLO BtdqFhR4Zwz/xih8NCcMjnvktGah1Nw4Q+udH8z6S+qx3iW1ebOXG4I5GvI++0o+cf8j 41fHGK3f4KyFf7RqwPrmfuCP0Cdu4Wplo+tgCv8P5uxYW5c1tM5Px43W5/WgcH9nMbgs AzY1HJnoh7l7LFZaEY3N8kiYiubpZBY8bErMHhMTZTI74N+BhcgJnp3CqgObRRHZ3Q+t y77g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681449486; x=1684041486; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=1fKfSxhlkAytD1rBjULhwpAKXv+7tPEkQdemvQfacXw=; b=E4OMW3jOAAn6z9siu/9GeztdxclXNcaxAJb5+a090H/+w/uAwlHPa/9E4qE2aMCd1F cynvaPKj7M2NQDcgmVIcFYyZjk0+O4QIP+zZKuRF9u9eKH/KGF9nnTvIYlf7wM6d1qP9 1lS+yOyFq4LQJ0pk+lNNH/i5Bku6P2Fmeq0nl8QjpwmNPiBVZLTo2BDX6bcecpuHbHbA 2Z3lt2JKH+nnE27pT2MXkqpZJCck0Qh94uG/4zTeugibyMGr0vHFZF0FlxumibskYU5p 60+J1cQ7mknSLyzFFQnQ0TgMgJ8QBYquYXDpGgdv6ohILAVtecUygsz/2F7vK94Fr9cH mFtw== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9cK5GgSDp5otywRjoZQmHkdqT7bJHZG8+9j1PLE+DU8Ewau1M4f NH04R45axcGYrfxKAo3CiWs9SCEquAKfmGukBw4BTA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350YCO86enp9/nB+1kNwnNkX3hcGEAUT9Njz3gTZ6DkRbXp/wAAkTeKFN9axoovnoCjp88zJczxG58u6Su00QMQk= X-Received: by 2002:a9f:309a:0:b0:772:1980:ee09 with SMTP id j26-20020a9f309a000000b007721980ee09mr2827540uab.1.1681449485761; Thu, 13 Apr 2023 22:18:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230411045908.844901-1-rushilg@google.com> <20230411045908.844901-2-rushilg@google.com> <2fa761ca-7b40-cf61-22cf-0078cf331f7d@amd.com> <382d5e88-0f52-863b-e20e-746b6b81c8b9@amd.com> In-Reply-To: From: Rushil Gupta Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 22:17:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: "Guo, Junfeng" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Qi Z" , "techboard@dpdk.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004eed8b05f944f75a" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --0000000000004eed8b05f944f75a Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I want to highlight that we wish to keep license changes separate from this patch (probably for 23.11). This patch is to simply support basic structures for the DQO data path. On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:04=E2=80=AFAM Rushil Gupta = wrote: > Sorry for the confusion. I was talking about the same patch (titled > net/gve: update copyright holders); however, I am not able to find it on > patchwork. > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:03=E2=80=AFAM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > >> On 4/12/2023 4:42 PM, Rushil Gupta wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:41=E2=80=AFAM Guo, Junfeng > > > wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > -----Original Message----- >> > > From: Ferruh Yigit > > > >> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 17:35 >> > > To: Guo, Junfeng > > >; Richardson, Bruce >> > > > >> > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org ; Zhang, Qi Z >> > >; Rushil Gupta >> > > > >> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO >> > > >> > > On 4/12/2023 10:09 AM, Guo, Junfeng wrote: >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> -----Original Message----- >> > > >> From: Ferruh Yigit > > > >> > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 16:50 >> > > >> To: Guo, Junfeng > > >; Richardson, Bruce >> > > >> > >> >> > > >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org ; Zhang, Qi Z >> > >; Rushil Gupta >> > > >> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO >> > > >> >> > > >> On 4/11/2023 7:51 AM, Guo, Junfeng wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >> Hi Junfeng, message moved down. >> > > >> >> > > >>> >> > > >>>> -----Original Message----- >> > > >>>> From: Rushil Gupta > > > >> > > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 12:59 >> > > >>>> To: Zhang, Qi Z > > >; ferruh.yigit@amd.com >> > >> > > >>>> Cc: Richardson, Bruce > > >; >> > > dev@dpdk.org ; >> > > >>>> Rushil Gupta > > >; Guo, Junfeng >> > > >>>> > >> > > >>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Update gve base code to support DQO. >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> This patch is based on this: >> > > >>>> >> > > >> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27647&state=3D* >> > > > >> > > >>>> >> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Rushil Gupta > > > >> > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo > > > >> > > >>> Hi Ferruh & Bruce, >> > > >>> >> > > >>> This patch contains few lines change for the MIT licensed gv= e >> base >> > > code. >> > > >>> Note that there is no new files added, just some minor code >> > update. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Do we need to ask for special approval from the Tech Board f= or >> > this? >> > > >>> Please help give some advice and also help review this patch= . >> > Thanks! >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> Once the MIT license exception is in place, as far as I know = no >> > more >> > > >> approval is required per change. >> > > > >> > > > Got it, thanks the comment! >> > > > >> > > > Then we may also need your help to review, as well as the comi= ng >> > patch >> > > > set for GVE PMD enhancement for DPDK 23.07. Thanks in advance! >> > > > >> > > >> >> > > >>> BTW, Google will also help replace all the base code under M= IT >> > > license >> > > >>> with the ones under BSD-3 license soon, which would make >> things >> > > more >> > > >>> easier. >> > > >>> >> > > >> >> > > >> Is this different from base code under DPDK is changing licen= se >> > [1] ? >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> [1] >> > > >> >> > > >> > >> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27570&state=3D%2A&a= r < >> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27570&state=3D%2A&a= r> >> > > >> chive=3Dboth >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > > The patch set of the above link only contains the processing o= f >> > replace >> > > the >> > > > MIT licensed base code with the BSD-3 licensed base code. Afte= r >> some >> > > > discussion, we think Google is in the right place to do that >> > work. And >> > > they >> > > > are working on that now. >> > > > >> > > >> > > Is the Google GVE driver [2] in the process of changing license >> > from MIT >> > > to BSD-3? >> > > >> > > >> > > [2] >> > > https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet- >> > >> > > linux/tree/v1.3.0/google/gve >> > > >> > >> > I'm not sure, I don't know much about Google's plans. >> > Maybe they could provide some info here. Thanks! >> > >> > @Rushil Gupta >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > > This patch is mainly for the feature upstreaming of DPDK 23.07= . >> It >> > > contains >> > > > only the code part, following previous license statements, >> > without any >> > > > license change. >> > > > >> > > > This patch is separated and sent by Google, to ensure there is >> > no license >> > > > violation. >> > > > >> > > > BTW, about the feature of GVE PMD enhancement, the rest code >> are all >> > > > about BSD-3 licensed files, and that patch set will be sent ou= t >> > soon. >> > > > >> > > > Thanks! >> > >> > I have got the green light internally to switch to BSD-3 license for >> > code under base directory. If it is ok with the tech board, I can send= a >> > patch right away with all of the base files changed to BSD-3 which can >> > be merged after this patch. Please let me know what you think. >> > We are also about to upstream driver >> > code: >> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd = < >> https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd> >> to FreeBSD as well so you will see similar code under BSD license soon i= n >> freebsd repo. >> >> >> +techboard >> >> There is already a patch [1] to change dpdk gve driver license from MIT >> to BSD-3, what will be different in the patch you are planning to send? >> >> Or overall I am trying to understand what is this new development on top >> of existing patch. >> >> >> >> >> >> --0000000000004eed8b05f944f75a Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I want to highlight that we wish to keep license changes s= eparate from this patch (probably for 23.11). This patch is to simply suppo= rt basic structures for the DQO data path.

On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 11:04=E2= =80=AFAM Rushil Gupta <rushilg@goo= gle.com> wrote:
Sorry for the confusion. I was talking about the sa= me patch (titled net/gve: update copyright holders); however, I am not able= to find it on patchwork.


On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:03=E2=80= =AFAM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
On 4/12/2023 4:42 PM, Rushil Gupta wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:41=E2=80=AFAM Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo@intel.com
> <mailto:= junfeng.guo@intel.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> -----Original Message-----
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:ferruh.yigit@amd.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 17:35
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> To: Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo@intel.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:junfeng.guo@intel.com>>; Richardson, Bruce
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> <bruce.richardson@intel.com <mailto:bruce.richardson@intel= .com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Cc: dev@dpdk.org <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>; Zhang, Qi Z
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<qi.z.zhang@intel.com <mailto:qi.z.zhang@intel.com>>; Rushil Gup= ta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> <rushilg@google.com <mailto:rushilg@google.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base = code for DQO
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> On 4/12/2023 10:09 AM, Guo, Junfeng wrote:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> -----Original Message-----
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:ferruh.yigit@amd.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 16:50=
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> To: Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo@intel.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:junfeng.guo@intel.com>>; Richardson, Bruce
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com <mailto:bruce.richard= son@intel.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>; Zhang, Qi Z
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<qi.z.zhang@intel.com <mailto:qi.z.zhang@intel.com>>; Rushil Gup= ta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> <rushilg@google.com <mailto:rushilg@google.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: upd= ate base code for DQO
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> On 4/11/2023 7:51 AM, Guo, Junfeng wr= ote:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Hi Junfeng, message moved down.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> -----Original Message----- >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> From: Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:rushilg@google.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023= 12:59
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com=
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:qi.z.zhang@intel.com>>; ferruh.yigit@amd.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richards= on@intel.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com>>;
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> dev@dpdk.org <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>;
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:rushilg@google.com>>; Guo, Junfeng
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> <junfeng.guo@intel.com <mailto:junfeng.guo@intel.co= m>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve:= update base code for DQO
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Update gve base code to suppo= rt DQO.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> This patch is based on this:<= br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27647&state= =3D*
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27647&state=3D= *>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rushil Gupta &= lt;rushilg@google.c= om
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:rushilg@google.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo &l= t;junfeng.guo@in= tel.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:junfeng.guo@intel.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> Hi Ferruh & Bruce,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> This patch contains few lines cha= nge for the MIT licensed gve base
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> code.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> Note that there is no new files a= dded, just some minor code
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0update.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> Do we need to ask for special app= roval from the Tech Board for
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0this?
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> Please help give some advice and = also help review this patch.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Thanks!
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Once the MIT license exception is in = place, as far as I know no
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0more
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> approval is required per change.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > Got it, thanks the comment!
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > Then we may also need your help to review= , as well as the coming
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0patch
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > set for GVE PMD enhancement for DPDK 23.0= 7. Thanks in advance!
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> BTW, Google will also help replac= e all the base code under MIT
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> license
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> with the ones under BSD-3 license= soon, which would make things
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> more
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> easier.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Is this different from base code unde= r DPDK is changing license
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0[1] ?
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> [1]
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27570&state= =3D%2A&ar <https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27570&state=3D%= 2A&ar>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> chive=3Dboth
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > The patch set of the above link only cont= ains the processing of
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0replace
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> the
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > MIT licensed base code with the BSD-3 lic= ensed base code. After some
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > discussion, we think Google is in the rig= ht place to do that
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0work. And
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> they
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > are working on that now.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Is the Google GVE driver [2] in the process of= changing license
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0from MIT
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> to BSD-3?
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> [2]
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> https:/= /github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<https://= github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet->
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> linux/tree/v1.3.0/google/gve
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0I'm not sure, I don't know much about Googl= e's plans.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Maybe they could provide some info here. Thanks! >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0@Rushil Gupta
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > This patch is mainly for the feature upst= reaming of DPDK 23.07. It
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> contains
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > only the code part, following previous li= cense statements,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0without any
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > license change.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > This patch is separated and sent by Googl= e, to ensure there is
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0no license
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > violation.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > BTW, about the feature of GVE PMD enhance= ment, the rest code are all
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > about BSD-3 licensed files, and that patc= h set will be sent out
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0soon.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > Thanks!
>
> I have got the green light internally to switch to BSD-3 license for > code under base directory. If it is ok with the tech board, I can send= a
> patch right away with all of the base files changed to BSD-3 which can=
> be merged after this patch. Please let me know what you think.
> We are also about to upstream driver
> code:=C2=A0https://githu= b.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd <https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatfo= rm/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd> to FreeBSD as well so you will = see similar code under BSD license soon in freebsd repo.=C2=A0


+techboard

There is already a patch [1] to change dpdk gve driver license from MIT
to BSD-3, what will be different in the patch you are planning to send?

Or overall I am trying to understand what is this new development on top of existing patch.





--0000000000004eed8b05f944f75a--