From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884934292A; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:04:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F398410F2; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:04:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-vs1-f48.google.com (mail-vs1-f48.google.com [209.85.217.48]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8505F406A2 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 20:04:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-vs1-f48.google.com with SMTP id i8so3719916vsv.4 for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:04:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1681322661; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QB7teJ9gDe6MyGgo4GAxQTJOXOkdDBXf9q2gFa+qMSU=; b=u9iLUOJLNEgWFst+lzziAKTb2DSLH8VLtURY0VyrTaUxRsNFmzcMi67W9Vm/MjNn/0 2da2dTobcVxX7QChR8RG5oFNvFdAb7mPe+YiE9fTZ3BoFsxljRhb2PzFiSA7kaRAT1gn 7ORygPf4GYOFveQGK6xV4iTZM1xsdLFm7YVclhpfSAz9yiQNFBZG5cvqAdshBYr04tFu nEq9XO210OZ3pdUtFiQIJP/tYSz5VhjIZfh2v25bZVK9xeKAidvsMmywqBqiRoJyca+0 zhmlIalcFnZMDZtlZ0NHDSa9IavPE9H/WXg+JVlTBXCGkY4SDBtznxCH7Xw9UcqlydGE FmKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1681322661; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=QB7teJ9gDe6MyGgo4GAxQTJOXOkdDBXf9q2gFa+qMSU=; b=cPOTWosmSmTGoC/w0vVscNzfo0/37dMxSMd5aBvIETQarOhdZWnpa466+ZLNKcfeND cAntlPhF1WecI+nYXaykyI6d6AA77tB0xGNKaU9wzqQ7yq9aTC6HMoaJNYM9etGSBqGY /xpB5YTnkMCSXJlsGdULTMRvAhnniLPubQKv+ZoLcY+gVKz4vF749m8cfTQtSOSdIRnY O0wqJmpL41s/gd+NPaxpTGn9+ahpMz9Y4un9dMH3CsncuKcfdT7F8e5LZd6HWZLqTu2+ G6LwUYPvIbhS33NsjD43ggXYAUBhp3xsaQdghHRBi75Tq2RpiH0f2IiJ/xh3hxuYig4H 7QiA== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9eDQe0DsWlgtX25BxR7aG2ReaTICdHfDbJ6UnzPz+VFdT6wGSsp 9mAuL2x0tZgXJ0ugqheATnIe7JD1UTV9DlKKdPtsxWdKpEmgu0YLlPhURl1c X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350bb+O/2MXRCUefsAMKjwWnLd8sMosNY50kvWo4FF82avqnpL37wbK8+RNpG1qvbn0u87x1UjZMJgbg42DLImrE= X-Received: by 2002:a67:d904:0:b0:42c:77ab:4d1b with SMTP id t4-20020a67d904000000b0042c77ab4d1bmr4595998vsj.5.1681322660606; Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:04:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230411045908.844901-1-rushilg@google.com> <20230411045908.844901-2-rushilg@google.com> <2fa761ca-7b40-cf61-22cf-0078cf331f7d@amd.com> <382d5e88-0f52-863b-e20e-746b6b81c8b9@amd.com> In-Reply-To: From: Rushil Gupta Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 11:04:09 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: "Guo, Junfeng" , "Richardson, Bruce" , "dev@dpdk.org" , "Zhang, Qi Z" , "techboard@dpdk.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f0a88f05f9276fa2" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org --000000000000f0a88f05f9276fa2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sorry for the confusion. I was talking about the same patch (titled net/gve: update copyright holders); however, I am not able to find it on patchwork. On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:03=E2=80=AFAM Ferruh Yigit = wrote: > On 4/12/2023 4:42 PM, Rushil Gupta wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:41=E2=80=AFAM Guo, Junfeng > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Ferruh Yigit > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 17:35 > > > To: Guo, Junfeng > >; Richardson, Bruce > > > > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org ; Zhang, Qi Z > > >; Rushil Gupta > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO > > > > > > On 4/12/2023 10:09 AM, Guo, Junfeng wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > >> From: Ferruh Yigit > > > > > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 16:50 > > > >> To: Guo, Junfeng > >; Richardson, Bruce > > > >> >> > > > >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org ; Zhang, Qi Z > > >; Rushil Gupta > > > >> > > > > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO > > > >> > > > >> On 4/11/2023 7:51 AM, Guo, Junfeng wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi Junfeng, message moved down. > > > >> > > > >>> > > > >>>> -----Original Message----- > > > >>>> From: Rushil Gupta > > > > > >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 12:59 > > > >>>> To: Zhang, Qi Z > >; ferruh.yigit@amd.com > > > > > >>>> Cc: Richardson, Bruce > >; > > > dev@dpdk.org ; > > > >>>> Rushil Gupta > >; Guo, Junfeng > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base code for DQO > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Update gve base code to support DQO. > > > >>>> > > > >>>> This patch is based on this: > > > >>>> > > > https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27647&stat= e=3D* > > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Rushil Gupta > > > > > >>>> Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo > > > > > >>> Hi Ferruh & Bruce, > > > >>> > > > >>> This patch contains few lines change for the MIT licensed gve > base > > > code. > > > >>> Note that there is no new files added, just some minor code > > update. > > > >>> > > > >>> Do we need to ask for special approval from the Tech Board fo= r > > this? > > > >>> Please help give some advice and also help review this patch. > > Thanks! > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Once the MIT license exception is in place, as far as I know n= o > > more > > > >> approval is required per change. > > > > > > > > Got it, thanks the comment! > > > > > > > > Then we may also need your help to review, as well as the comin= g > > patch > > > > set for GVE PMD enhancement for DPDK 23.07. Thanks in advance! > > > > > > > >> > > > >>> BTW, Google will also help replace all the base code under MI= T > > > license > > > >>> with the ones under BSD-3 license soon, which would make thin= gs > > > more > > > >>> easier. > > > >>> > > > >> > > > >> Is this different from base code under DPDK is changing licens= e > > [1] ? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> [1] > > > >> > > > > > > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27570&state=3D%2A&ar= < > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27570&state=3D%2A&ar= > > > > >> chive=3Dboth > > > >> > > > > > > > > The patch set of the above link only contains the processing of > > replace > > > the > > > > MIT licensed base code with the BSD-3 licensed base code. After > some > > > > discussion, we think Google is in the right place to do that > > work. And > > > they > > > > are working on that now. > > > > > > > > > > Is the Google GVE driver [2] in the process of changing license > > from MIT > > > to BSD-3? > > > > > > > > > [2] > > > https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet- > > > > > linux/tree/v1.3.0/google/gve > > > > > > > I'm not sure, I don't know much about Google's plans. > > Maybe they could provide some info here. Thanks! > > > > @Rushil Gupta > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch is mainly for the feature upstreaming of DPDK 23.07. > It > > > contains > > > > only the code part, following previous license statements, > > without any > > > > license change. > > > > > > > > This patch is separated and sent by Google, to ensure there is > > no license > > > > violation. > > > > > > > > BTW, about the feature of GVE PMD enhancement, the rest code ar= e > all > > > > about BSD-3 licensed files, and that patch set will be sent out > > soon. > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > I have got the green light internally to switch to BSD-3 license for > > code under base directory. If it is ok with the tech board, I can send = a > > patch right away with all of the base files changed to BSD-3 which can > > be merged after this patch. Please let me know what you think. > > We are also about to upstream driver > > code: > https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd < > https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd> > to FreeBSD as well so you will see similar code under BSD license soon in > freebsd repo. > > > +techboard > > There is already a patch [1] to change dpdk gve driver license from MIT > to BSD-3, what will be different in the patch you are planning to send? > > Or overall I am trying to understand what is this new development on top > of existing patch. > > > > > > --000000000000f0a88f05f9276fa2 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sorry for the confusion. I was talking about the same patc= h (titled net/gve: update copyright holders); however, I am not able to fin= d it on patchwork.


On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 9:03=E2=80=AFAM Fe= rruh Yigit <fe= rruh.yigit@amd.com> wrote:
On 4/12/2023 4:42 PM, Rushil Gupta wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 2:41=E2=80=AFAM Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo@intel.com
> <mailto:= junfeng.guo@intel.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> -----Original Message-----
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:ferruh.yigit@amd.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 17:35
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> To: Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo@intel.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:junfeng.guo@intel.com>>; Richardson, Bruce
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> <bruce.richardson@intel.com <mailto:bruce.richardson@intel= .com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Cc: dev@dpdk.org <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>; Zhang, Qi Z
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<qi.z.zhang@intel.com <mailto:qi.z.zhang@intel.com>>; Rushil Gup= ta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> <rushilg@google.com <mailto:rushilg@google.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: update base = code for DQO
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> On 4/12/2023 10:09 AM, Guo, Junfeng wrote:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> -----Original Message-----
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:ferruh.yigit@amd.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2023 16:50=
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> To: Guo, Junfeng <junfeng.guo@intel.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:junfeng.guo@intel.com>>; Richardson, Bruce
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> <bruce.richardson@intel.com <mailto:bruce.richard= son@intel.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>; Zhang, Qi Z
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<qi.z.zhang@intel.com <mailto:qi.z.zhang@intel.com>>; Rushil Gup= ta
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> <rushilg@google.com <mailto:rushilg@google.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve: upd= ate base code for DQO
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> On 4/11/2023 7:51 AM, Guo, Junfeng wr= ote:
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Hi Junfeng, message moved down.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> -----Original Message----- >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> From: Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:rushilg@google.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023= 12:59
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com=
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:qi.z.zhang@intel.com>>; ferruh.yigit@amd.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:ferruh.yigit@amd.com>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Cc: Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richards= on@intel.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:bruce.richardson@intel.com>>;
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> dev@dpdk.org <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>;
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Rushil Gupta <rushilg@google.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:rushilg@google.com>>; Guo, Junfeng
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> <junfeng.guo@intel.com <mailto:junfeng.guo@intel.co= m>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] net/gve:= update base code for DQO
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Update gve base code to suppo= rt DQO.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> This patch is based on this:<= br> >=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27647&state= =3D*
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27647&state=3D= *>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Signed-off-by: Rushil Gupta &= lt;rushilg@google.c= om
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:rushilg@google.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>> Signed-off-by: Junfeng Guo &l= t;junfeng.guo@in= tel.com
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<mailto:junfeng.guo@intel.com>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> Hi Ferruh & Bruce,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> This patch contains few lines cha= nge for the MIT licensed gve base
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> code.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> Note that there is no new files a= dded, just some minor code
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0update.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> Do we need to ask for special app= roval from the Tech Board for
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0this?
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> Please help give some advice and = also help review this patch.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Thanks!
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Once the MIT license exception is in = place, as far as I know no
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0more
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> approval is required per change.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > Got it, thanks the comment!
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > Then we may also need your help to review= , as well as the coming
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0patch
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > set for GVE PMD enhancement for DPDK 23.0= 7. Thanks in advance!
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> BTW, Google will also help replac= e all the base code under MIT
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> license
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> with the ones under BSD-3 license= soon, which would make things
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> more
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>> easier.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> Is this different from base code unde= r DPDK is changing license
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0[1] ?
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> [1]
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27570&state= =3D%2A&ar <https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=3D27570&state=3D%= 2A&ar>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >> chive=3Dboth
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > The patch set of the above link only cont= ains the processing of
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0replace
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> the
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > MIT licensed base code with the BSD-3 lic= ensed base code. After some
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > discussion, we think Google is in the rig= ht place to do that
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0work. And
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> they
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > are working on that now.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> Is the Google GVE driver [2] in the process of= changing license
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0from MIT
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> to BSD-3?
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> [2]
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> https:/= /github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0<https://= github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet->
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> linux/tree/v1.3.0/google/gve
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0I'm not sure, I don't know much about Googl= e's plans.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Maybe they could provide some info here. Thanks! >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0@Rushil Gupta
>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0>
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > This patch is mainly for the feature upst= reaming of DPDK 23.07. It
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> contains
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > only the code part, following previous li= cense statements,
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0without any
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > license change.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > This patch is separated and sent by Googl= e, to ensure there is
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0no license
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > violation.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > BTW, about the feature of GVE PMD enhance= ment, the rest code are all
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > about BSD-3 licensed files, and that patc= h set will be sent out
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0soon.
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> >
>=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0> > Thanks!
>
> I have got the green light internally to switch to BSD-3 license for > code under base directory. If it is ok with the tech board, I can send= a
> patch right away with all of the base files changed to BSD-3 which can=
> be merged after this patch. Please let me know what you think.
> We are also about to upstream driver
> code:=C2=A0https://githu= b.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd <https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatfo= rm/compute-virtual-ethernet-freebsd> to FreeBSD as well so you will = see similar code under BSD license soon in freebsd repo.=C2=A0


+techboard

There is already a patch [1] to change dpdk gve driver license from MIT
to BSD-3, what will be different in the patch you are planning to send?

Or overall I am trying to understand what is this new development on top of existing patch.





--000000000000f0a88f05f9276fa2--