From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f173.google.com (mail-io0-f173.google.com [209.85.223.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615403257 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 10:47:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-io0-f173.google.com with SMTP id l15so1523931iol.8 for ; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 01:47:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zEb1g3UTYR43++pBGUEwoVxujTQrz3VsxjMqcQ3/Ip4=; b=US/DtbYbG2AocW4HhhaKKNG4O2ajukzrAexU+xBDrQ8BLoXJM/dnl9eSxPmiu88vbZ hqI1sVkbu3e+nY/8p2ByHF6iEf2hOZpCgyvde03ULslT0AaT5uqghUxs7Mdnj/GgzvlR Hvs374kLnQVupS3cb7PYBHHzxSWonMMZDeG0avi/H/g7W41UOj00X5zkFQ0BBdMTXCJD htVbYT6u/PrJo9kT092ocdm25s/g1unyKrAy+HfH7JgMaP+730w2DBesW+hf9U51FqPh 309h2z8yqWMYzypjI9Lh6AAmiwB+9ctefbBcmTFwdYL+kS/vBesPwE0P2roMpDkwVPQX LN2g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zEb1g3UTYR43++pBGUEwoVxujTQrz3VsxjMqcQ3/Ip4=; b=hprZRYnrSVWmQmVfUB7z0uY0jqHLH0MzhUIM19nSbUmM1oT9Z9beJki/x3tCe+Sy46 vGv857OlxqH428sjTSb5aLdIJOjJxxASJPWzb6w03am5NPk2LmdAtVrMzJDIsfeU1633 BDpXYX7D0NKB/YB1FrgfxC1IASs7Urz6HSNxPjCKIzBCA3mylLAXDyuUwhNa9yDnZB9b PlmhIa0NaZMDmhA4vO4bIkyc/MSgftP29rq5uOwz8fCJIkVzPkrH/zrfdZKh4Rkm2XSs aouMCDxVM96MvZCJKV5FtTriA5wSEgYvHIg3cu3hmhomoGLoDaWIYSQg22yH8IbFPKkm b12Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVAv2e2M8ILsZ2/u6cQQA0KAcgR/lBfAufl/uHUdkcvHiTpNWBr bLJbe8mgUtWrEjWfrphjg8lBN/biGL76YcqQ661JYA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QDno4jrIf0zOkPA51iltEv8eB/BqTiPL2fWIx5TJebG1xcQvTu3Gwg49ZSGt0x24/KQAnZxQzyI60lsQkhvdQE= X-Received: by 10.107.114.6 with SMTP id n6mr9985984ioc.51.1506761265431; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 01:47:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.168.220 with HTTP; Sat, 30 Sep 2017 01:47:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Bonaparte Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 16:47:05 +0800 Message-ID: To: DPDK Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Can xenvirt pmd work in xen guest (aka DomU) without xen-vhost in Dom0 ? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2017 08:47:46 -0000 Hi, everybody: I am trying to run dpdk in xen guest, after trying dpdk17.05 without success, I tried dpdk16.04 again. and it's sucessful to run testpmd this time. but it can't receive any packets. the command I used is : ./testpmd -l 1,2 -n 4 --vdev=3D"eth_xenvirt0,mac=3Da6:38:57:e8:d5:be" --vdev=3D"eth_xenvirt1,mac=3D32:f1:42:55:94:74" -- --total-num-mbufs=3D2048 I read the xen guide again, I found the guide says: DPDK provides a para-virtualization packet switching solution, based on the Xen hypervisor=E2=80=99s Grant Table, Note 1, which provides simple and fas= t packet switching capability between guest domains and host domain based on MAC address or VLAN tag. This solution is comprised of two components; a Poll Mode Driver (PMD) as the front end in the guest domain and a switching back end in the host domain. does it mean that dpdk running in DomU must cooperate with xen-vhost in Dom0 ? I really need your help. I appreciate any reply from you .