From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <programme110@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com (mail-it0-f42.google.com
 [209.85.214.42]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE5D29C8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 20 Jul 2017 06:32:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-it0-f42.google.com with SMTP id v127so10569802itd.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 21:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=uCIAWGxAFMBDQnR5ZRDUE2b82HqoRjuaO/YIUwePVUA=;
 b=CkGfhnxM7bKRCQe8zXSAnpu0xb/BUprfymH8Blr85tjjbQ2tZy/etU08KTOWdbvPb3
 tBdRd0XoBNrkhKuXmnaxKDhIbBYZ4BSZcPj+TtX4zU2Gtgkk4+JYVHnl2dyuHv09X6bW
 g0vYvS7a9hd4NJEE5xSl3Pd2TFAokfumApXMUTJmam52uVDrq9S3wOc9dN6Ifnep9G+X
 UpfJvnpiqhZ+eNagvix8kncWdzopU9zxo8CBl6Ll+MG2Fwq+q6xHx2W4zRHVHB1eKkp0
 9KUVD+4ZP0QpJt7tphDfJYYPzkXSkH0QPlYbg3Fbpd6v4KWhVTaGab7RUkeJweiDp/HG
 wh0Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=uCIAWGxAFMBDQnR5ZRDUE2b82HqoRjuaO/YIUwePVUA=;
 b=BGjCEWOQk9o3nZLL91OlypuapjGKrSjK9LNGWu3tPXuxRUkflAPBMoH66rQk7i0vTK
 u5T4gLEsyKAtnwgzHbmxQ3EvoISxDZRCCk+YG6rPvMp66NE6AJRA9bo+9eFp+yIeHQdy
 OvQF+L73sfC4v0CwLgiN4FqwjBMBhxLNtu5sG5HpYN0VMDE7tYnd6+fw9ZHZGr+QHqhq
 t7mw1zuJIcY6ZxQCaEL+Pmj/3CcH11Xk3p1Q1JY7jgtBhLHUWdk+tE077rUPvQEVwvT3
 xr1x760OPGp4Gtno57MRIMeZpbibJU3WaiJPQQwa5+jg53GEIzKfSr26vqmEH2Y3bYmS
 366A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113WzC9/xF+Qrf2JckHkA6oK0r1ugWzPHpOIgEIfIlrQVZNUHyH/
 rZ43rX8gDrdeCtP+Mokp2N1b+tw7oY9g
X-Received: by 10.36.115.74 with SMTP id y71mr2198613itb.46.1500525153716;
 Wed, 19 Jul 2017 21:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.20.136 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 21:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bill Bonaparte <programme110@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 12:31:53 +0800
Message-ID: <CAO8FX+SsVGqpadbN97g+yy8b5xZ9DLa4=2dmK+mQO=4JE97HOw@mail.gmail.com>
To: DPDK <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] only two of the four queues work on the VF interface of
 Intel X553 nic.
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 04:32:35 -0000

Hi all,
        I encounter a problem that there are two of the four queues working
for dpdk-apps when using the VF interface of intel x553 10G-ethernet NIC.
Straightly speaking, there are no packets coming into the last two queues,
no matter what packets I send to the dpdk-apps.
        I checked the initialization of the queues,  it shows  that all
four queues are initialized successfully.
        If I use the PF directly for dpdk-apps, there is no such problem.
        If I missed some configuration when using the VF ?
        if so, what should I do ?

        I am appreciate to get some  discussion from you.