From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7892FA052B; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:31:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34FF410A3; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:31:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com (mail-pl1-f169.google.com [209.85.214.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D582A69 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 17:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d1so14465462plr.8 for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:30:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=broadcom.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=IBmpx4blb0uiGCcjuCecG60U7TytriOFKDzk+NiFPHM=; b=bdOPeAfOi720Ifg+hkRZ8q8CaJSr1dDLbLf5G9QCVt626Hb7IzzKOC22qEoP0rWEdP FKLyHcDx4plITV9lnvBTDhXElLyDCF9SikyYMybwQjPToADjf4I+RurSKestzewUjJfM 6KWyvQIDu5pLHFLOmNUaBJf3722zato55kmWQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IBmpx4blb0uiGCcjuCecG60U7TytriOFKDzk+NiFPHM=; b=EXFdt8j67ok/25FQGiNOZbuDigeMP0uKn+DdJG/mNKIG0Vp7ZDj5WSMVv5Hu6K5eb+ j0CE9KEliIyaHF9BmqBnNvQLkrbzHDJRgYRAfEEJoMo0G8oJBPA0q37hzXbeEPntCBZQ WfXFIE3UttONHdbKjte0QXfl3UXYbKCWg6kyhJny+qVV6d/LcKffZJyAArMHLM50D6Sh O1nd4Zlknb1WdudSCBrFwIwrMIPpuGVXfR/TtjTUhpmsKd5coAjq1ZAQWv9S2amRiPZa /NcS7varMBY2FSfrccTSem5rR+Wr0Mz5tecU4PUmxDlx0C2IKNxfaxBpCQ4Rj3WI9+dj 9Rvw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5320jpE76h/r8cXFAMPusEwVm8gbW2QOw6eUorxRdfdflF7QrV0v eiZXspxBpCsJvgPhDHRk11F5iUhg8XO1qdhUDQ+y3g== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzSDlGri+uRkLBNxSeJdLEZwM6iiQ17/xo6N9r0g/wmNQrRvoPSpGbNRsyoOpo1eaSf+GhoN6rev5lZOCagZ60= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:a68:: with SMTP id o95mr15742367pjo.148.1596123058252; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 08:30:58 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1586318694-31358-1-git-send-email-xuemingl@mellanox.com> <1587110623-405-3-git-send-email-xuemingl@mellanox.com> In-Reply-To: From: Somnath Kotur Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 21:00:46 +0530 Message-ID: To: "Xueming(Steven) Li" Cc: "Iremonger, Bernard" , "Burakov, Anatoly" , "Yigit, Ferruh" , Stephen Hemminger , "dev@dpdk.org" , Asaf Penso Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 2/2] app/testpmd: support malloc and free tracking log X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 8:43 PM Xueming(Steven) Li wrote: > > Hi Som, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Somnath Kotur > > Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2020 11:10 PM > > To: Iremonger, Bernard > > Cc: Xueming(Steven) Li ; Burakov, Anatoly > > ; Yigit, Ferruh ; Stephen > > Hemminger ; dev@dpdk.org; Asaf Penso > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 2/2] app/testpmd: support malloc and free > > tracking log > > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 7:11 PM Iremonger, Bernard > > wrote: > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: dev On Behalf Of Xueming Li > > > > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 9:04 AM > > > > To: Burakov, Anatoly ; Yigit, Ferruh > > > > ; Stephen Hemminger > > > > > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Asaf Penso > > > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v2 2/2] app/testpmd: support malloc and > > > > free tracking log > > > > > > > > New CLI commands to manipulate malloc tracking log: > > > > > > > > dump_malloc start : start malloc tracking with number of buffers > > > > dump_malloc dump : dump mmalloc tracking log with detail level > > > > dump_malloc stop: stop malloc tracking > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xueming Li > > > > > > Acked-by: Bernard Iremonger > > > > Sorry if this has been answered already, but just wanted to know if there is any > > reason this is not yet merged in ...could be a useful tool to debug leaks in PMDs > > Is there any other /better way to identify memory leaks now which is why this > > is no longer under consideration ? > > AFAIK, new tracking point system is introduced to record key event not only memory. > So this patchset no longer valid. Hmm sorry didn't get that ..did you mean tracing system ? Could you please elaborate and provide any pointers on setting this up for monitoring memory? Any pointers would be greatly appreciated > > > > > Thanks > > som > >