From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE783A0C47; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:39:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6274116F; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:39:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-ed1-f52.google.com (mail-ed1-f52.google.com [209.85.208.52]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AA3F4116F for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:39:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-ed1-f52.google.com with SMTP id ec8so30869859edb.6 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:39:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=WJ02TQ5dDGqp1AHaeScIZc45ATWg5iW1GMR3ulohiiw=; b=dQQzpkrwXOsbdJeziUdLvnV3S+mYwOc66UlSKkwMREi7obLxI1Y46TsqVBzYNuONgz clhcXjvkZQ2cQN4/d6ea4ZMYZU0aYOzBSX/QWE+pm9YDT9LvlFMKiYlHMFtEmyjAv/xc HyFKQ6b+rwgMs5i4X/YjUpzBRgw6/up0kHQfE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WJ02TQ5dDGqp1AHaeScIZc45ATWg5iW1GMR3ulohiiw=; b=ie3jn8uTttslrlhLFYjmhbhIowdyRYQ+nOJjVAZFldJ/5s0KFoT92Kf5lb3RVq1S3Z 5FxCOAhP7Uh0q49RChna1cZTzZyPfc7kO317ymAG3/LrqE7tjkvrrqhi67hETU7EWcsy 6gp71z5Lhvs+jrMexaN8ki1d3ihZVRjtJXkghlAljzQs33t2K2Yr5Gc2OB3EykkA0eLE AFNstqiwRoY68rAEp+xJnIPXQUFrLlP0jAhPyL6hREjgWlsHoWcEk0Th233vgaXDyf+t QybkuORRWHA0m/EYImdWlsE5HDFwUIooi+7sxwZR5nioux7iUJZOuI1+c6EvPdcaw5kV xUgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531q8UvHdcbX/kDDUlIkjGcpnLSru8wazu74jCOaTs4QYxWKf3QQ brBOUsf1XqmL9NYW+h3C5I7cW9SPXurHVy+9VLsDKQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4iliPkwkIHcBxNUIdRvSspdyuu7lWH3plYmv+Ao9F3LLccgjLplU3SL66hx538lTFkz6vbZuq2cZb7JrppjU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:350b:: with SMTP id b11mr28491185edd.341.1634042368501; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 05:39:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7c1ead6b-6e3a-ad0b-ea80-25dd266db87e@intel.com> <496be70d3a6343a8be1306df53d67e23@intel.com> <3966d240-433c-5398-f49b-aecacd1387ef@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <75ef7155-f8d4-4917-4dda-400340e9d1e2@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: From: Lincoln Lavoie Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 08:39:17 -0400 Message-ID: To: Ferruh Yigit Cc: Thinh Tran , Brandon Lo , "Zhang, Qi Z" , dev , "Yang, Qiming" , "ci@dpdk.org" , Aaron Conole , dpdklab , "Singh, Aman Deep" , David Marchand Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] RHEL7 failures X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Ferruh and Thinh, Yes, that will also work and should trigger the rebuild to the tip of the current git repo / branch. Apologizes for forgetting that behavior is built into the runner. All, That raises the question, for the planned work to allow triggering rebuilds / reruns through patchwork, what is the expected behavior, rerun exactly what was run before, or move to the current pointer (assuming it's moved on) and build/run on top of that? What best aligns with everyone's expectations, so we don't get confusion, etc.? Cheers, Lincoln On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:58 PM Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/11/2021 11:45 PM, Thinh Tran wrote: > > Hi Brandon, > > > > Does the rebuild have the fix for RHEL 7? Please check. > > > > I just checked the build status, it still hits the same failure on RHEL > 7: > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19066/ > > Your patch still applied on 'dpdk > (086d426406bd3f6fac96a15bbd871c7fe714bc2d)', > which doesn't have the fix. > It seems 'Rebuild' still using the same commit from dpdk. > > Submitting a new version of the patch can be easiest solution to > run CI on correct version. > > > > > [1502/2903] Compiling C object > drivers/net/ice/base/libice_base.a.p/ice_parser_rt.c.o > > FAILED: drivers/net/ice/base/libice_base.a.p/ice_parser_rt.c.o > > ccache cc -Idrivers/net/ice/base/libice_base.a.p -Idrivers/net/ice/base > -I../drivers/net/ice/base -I. -I.. -Iconfig -I../config -Ilib/eal/include > -I../lib/eal/include -Ilib/eal/linux/include -I../lib/eal/linux/include > -Ilib/eal/x86/include -I../lib/eal/x86/include -Ilib/eal/common > -I../lib/eal/common -Ilib/eal -I../lib/eal -Ilib/kvargs -I../lib/kvargs > -Ilib/metrics -I../lib/metrics -Ilib/telemetry -I../lib/telemetry -pipe > -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Werror -O3 -include > rte_config.h -Wextra -Wcast-qual -Wdeprecated -Wformat -Wformat-nonliteral > -Wformat-security -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wpointer-arith -Wsign-compare > -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wno-missing-field-initializers > -D_GNU_SOURCE -fPIC -march=native -DALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_API > -DALLOW_INTERNAL_API -Wno-unused-value -Wno-unused-but-set-variable > -Wno-unused-variable -Wno-unused-parameter -MD -MQ > > drivers/net/ice/base/libice_base.a.p/ice_parser_rt.c.o -MF > drivers/net/ice/base/libice_base.a.p/ice_parser_rt.c.o.d -o > drivers/net/ice/base/libice_base.a.p/ice_parser_rt.c.o -c > ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c > > ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function '_hv_bit_sel': > > ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:201:2: error: dereferencing > type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > [-Werror=strict-aliasing] > > d64 = *(u64 *)&b[0]; > > ^ > > ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function '_reg_bit_sel': > > ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:458:2: error: dereferencing > type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > [-Werror=strict-aliasing] > > d32 = *(u32 *)&v[0]; > > ^ > > cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > > > > Thanks, > > Thinh Tran > > > > On 10/11/2021 12:17 PM, Brandon Lo wrote: > >> Hi Thinh, > >> > >> I have started a rerun of the patch > >> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/100042 (patchset > >> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19066/). > >> You should see the new results reported over email soon. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Brandon > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 12:39 PM Thinh Tran > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi Linconln, > >>> > >>> I have this patch set 100042 - build/ppc: enable build support for > Power10 > >>> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/100042 > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Thinh Tran > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 10/11/2021 9:42 AM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > >>>> Hi Thinh, The CI won't automatically go back and retest failures > after a > >>>> patch was applied. This is a corner case, where a bad change was > merged > >>>> and affected all patches downstream of that merge. We can retrigger > >>>> specific patches, just ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart > >>>> This Message Is From an External Sender > >>>> This message came from outside your organization. > >>>> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd > >>>> Hi Thinh, > >>>> > >>>> The CI won't automatically go back and retest failures after a patch > was > >>>> applied. This is a corner case, where a bad change was merged and > >>>> affected all patches downstream of that merge. We can retrigger > >>>> specific patches, just let us know the patch number or the URI of the > >>>> patch(es). > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Lincoln > >>>> > >>>> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:39 AM Thinh Tran < > thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com > >>>> > wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi, > >>>> I'm wondering how or when the CI would re-pick up the patches > those > >>>> were > >>>> failed due to this issue? > >>>> > >>>> Regards, > >>>> Thinh Tran > >>>> > >>>> On 10/6/2021 10:40 PM, Zhang, Qi Z wrote: > >>>> > Hi Ferruh, David and Aman: > >>>> > > >>>> > Sorry for late response due to PRC holiday. > >>>> > I have just tested the patch and there is no issue be > >>>> detected for functions > >>>> > Thank you so much for the help! > >>>> > > >>>> > Regards > >>>> > Qi > >>>> > > >>>> >> -----Original Message----- > >>>> >> From: Yigit, Ferruh >>>> > > >>>> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 6, 2021 5:46 AM > >>>> >> To: Lincoln Lavoie >>>> >; dev >>>> >; Yang, Qiming > >>>> >> >; > Zhang, > >>>> Qi Z > > >>>> >> Cc: ci@dpdk.org ; Aaron Conole > >>>> >; dpdklab > >>>> >> >; Singh, > Aman > >>>> Deep aman.deep.singh@intel.com>>; > >>>> >> David Marchand >>>> > > >>>> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] RHEL7 failures > >>>> >> > >>>> >> On 10/5/2021 8:09 PM, Lincoln Lavoie wrote: > >>>> >>> Hello Qiming and Qi, > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> The CI is picking up failures when building on RHEL7, where > >>>> warnings > >>>> >>> are being treated as errors. This looks like something has > been > >>>> >>> merged into the mainline, as it's failing across all > patches. > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> Here is the specific failure: > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> ./drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function > '_hv_bit_sel': > >>>> >>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:201:2: error: > dereferencing > >>>> >>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > >>>> >>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing] > >>>> >>> d64 = *(u64 *)&b[0]; > >>>> >>> ^ > >>>> >>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c: In function > >>>> '_reg_bit_sel': > >>>> >>> ../drivers/net/ice/base/ice_parser_rt.c:458:2: error: > dereferencing > >>>> >>> type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules > >>>> >>> [-Werror=strict-aliasing] > >>>> >>> d32 = *(u32 *)&v[0]; > >>>> >>> ^ > >>>> >>> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors > >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> You can download a full set of logs from here (for a > failing run): > >>>> >>> https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/19162/ > >>>> > >>>> >>> > >>>> >> > >>>> >> Issue was reported by David, Aman sent the fix [1] and it is > >>>> already merged by > >>>> >> David [2], it should be fixed now, can you please double > check? > >>>> >> > >>>> >> [1] > >>>> >> > >>>> > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211005115754.34117-1-aman > >>>> < > https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/20211005115754.34117-1-aman> > >>>> >> .deep.singh@intel.com/ > >>>> >> > >>>> >> [2] > >>>> >> > >>>> > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=16b809d144dc2df7f31695b5abc64a809 > >>>> < > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=16b809d144dc2df7f31695b5abc64a809> > >>>> >> 021b154 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> *Lincoln Lavoie* > >>>> Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies > >>>> 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 > >>>> lylavoie@iol.unh.edu > >>>> https://www.iol.unh.edu > >>>> +1-603-674-2755 (m) > >>>> > >> > >> > >> > > -- *Lincoln Lavoie* Principal Engineer, Broadband Technologies 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 lylavoie@iol.unh.edu https://www.iol.unh.edu +1-603-674-2755 (m)