From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-qt0-f173.google.com (mail-qt0-f173.google.com
 [209.85.216.173]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A005D1B3C6
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  3 Apr 2018 08:45:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-qt0-f173.google.com with SMTP id w23so9985889qtn.3
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 23:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
 h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=M1XimNDRMG6ChAl9kolpTPxp0SkNmjSMVKdC97XMkIA=;
 b=KSIUI+nw+qIz4Z8KHCg9ckjpH7GCgQumwLWZq4PM+36UaPFN5SWeTASpCQNGnlMUsx
 EzzwOWgjADHo2Z2+6lUNoherL43wRctlL3+8VoM7N9VWRL47BIL0XhsAujddYQbOJHEE
 tFiQUnEamYpES0rfeeZrL5Oju6FaCgXvHbLaF9WaTHbS/wrHrR+OGPj0C5w75sRa1QTk
 T8ulK50IaS/5w/MtM5EdwOSFuBMPzEv/2IDEJ55HhQMFFPhbBDEKGFmKMJ0XsVi5VQQ3
 RZvcc4JQSlqwvFDefP1PToxvIUCrkRsgsmQz8RvswRmbX9ldhgXiZtqZEP5pC4BiB3PN
 qlhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
 bh=M1XimNDRMG6ChAl9kolpTPxp0SkNmjSMVKdC97XMkIA=;
 b=fXsCQTU3cpj0rmv9JNsBn2ijRpfqum67jfp5j4sRE31GPnJ1dYLoOq+vw9pyV/9HN4
 JUhiBx51/cshXuOXWTl+Gk5SMwytk+PrWVeidOI50iHodX8JfUH4bigLWUgnoryc4sIK
 FTYtJZfmYd72IL1avbdFa1Os04AI2FDZHRFNklrVkG4IZ4xZlFcaQ7apC3z6TW5KcCsO
 a5292MtB/4vcLqlDj/Qvfcfgm29hRs5QpwvQWK5TQVQJYURaw3l0cgHprewG3Yul9jwY
 iChyjorssti2otM4PNzdPEOmEMgu4XjZ+Yb3iawKztmL547lgQVZRQC/svPXm9Y3hdUg
 kHig==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tCRy/ihal0/j1uvhkCwqnBgUpH71m9VhYHs4yhYQyerAZyFSTm+
 vsl4pyifRztaQ/KVYBLmfUDxumaCVMENgCfdlVeqEQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/XPw1KanOoygzt31FzyWtmGzbGYEWrM5dyumoO+kBqilCHZGQLaodIp1IzXphdMLLWnsCO0keQ2OBGTweZMkk=
X-Received: by 10.200.26.58 with SMTP id v55mr18514241qtj.268.1522737941869;
 Mon, 02 Apr 2018 23:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.55.44.196 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 23:45:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Sam <batmanustc@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 14:45:41 +0800
Message-ID: <CAOE=1Z0Gm9Nve+isk_7hNHwGm68kFz8f-BCX3eb0Hh=jsugRXw@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Got bug while using valgrind on OVS-DPDK?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 06:45:42 -0000

Hi all,

I want to use valgrind to check if there is memleak of OVS-DPDK's
ovs-vswitchd, so I use this command:

valgrind ovs-vswitchd ...


But got errors like this:

the system does not support "RDRNAD"
> please check that RTE_MACHINE is set correctly


Does that mean valgrind does NOT support OVS-DPDK ovs-vswitchd? How could I
check if ovs-vswitchd has no memleak?

thank you~