From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f52.google.com (mail-wm0-f52.google.com [74.125.82.52]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B20BD2904 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 20:57:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l6so158504057wml.1 for ; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:57:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=gD5hXITTjHIEMGAn0LRjD+JUgmXPQUEuIfvcgASvtio=; b=w4oNaLWldm992UyddhvyvBJlBDQl3mIzkwqorFZJnwI4V/h2fNq8OuraGZpVApdrvQ PxKEHDlqwvi9mvgUWfJo3VjJhQhcN0TkqcLJOyP0dieZcwLhMG6/2Xla1nQXwgGOhpuc Gj65imSEB17oVUYRhsqUIP8fO0yTwqWbTQxrAr8qsComXrBcqj2lRtMXeUoVbxkh3TDd TcGFY6wHSLs4kElFsc2oMOB2Q8F7iEqoBsosBqf/O0YaZ4xf13hrlYoFcHD4v0R9dgSO OoDWmmnURz3ZhEdS/vuO4cS+lL9VAR77VBA3idZJgFffe0fiernoBQDGmZfO/LL+aY4W OC0Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=gD5hXITTjHIEMGAn0LRjD+JUgmXPQUEuIfvcgASvtio=; b=D3r2LwAsiE81kjV+ddlBIlv53R7EtRc41YlZgM+i5hVZvjqC7FMTgRDX0JvxDIXqFp 2nShYr9JUaCd/e04gFL6xoD8MIUo9MCVg/DEI4lvCoLOezG6CYum0EfuiaF3NiNCM/0p shJXtRE93AFVSGBpRPjDpBCa8JDUtmWqmIVBZ75Nkljdz/y0qqKrnElYBJlOVrgex+NH VZCNO6ZuKgwmrZ0KKOISLYKJT92rsY8eYp3TXaEv8/YWb/rwKoFL5ogmTRM6thZyMpLe 2GuNBIl2PbxOX6A4/PVa1MX2Dqia8CkTZM1sQNuH8rAd/4BwRayrJ1hS5w4pCsKuaNhp gPgA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVHHBoUIZzVx1WTNNhzyhAX2iZJ/lomt8N1BgZV54ecbyLTjEmdalMY9pIrR3XeIk4Ignf9x6yCwiwOIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.6.225 with SMTP id e1mr1881966wja.152.1460401046487; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:57:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.111.35 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Apr 2016 11:57:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:57:26 -0400 Message-ID: From: chintu hetam To: "Xie, Huawei" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 2.2 build failing with vhost-kni X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 18:57:26 -0000 I tried vhost-user mode, and during init of ./vhost-switch it fails with PMD: eth_ixgbe_dev_init(): port 0 vendorID=3D0x8086 deviceID=3D0x1528 pf queue num: 0, configured vmdq pool num: 64, each vmdq pool has 2 queues EAL: Error - exiting with code: 1 Cause: Cannot initialize network ports it's failing in port_init function, and it seems from http://dpdk.org/doc/guides-1.8/rel_notes/resolved_issues.html this has to with ixgbe checking for eeprom pba parameters. is that correct, coz rebuilding ixgbe 4.3.13 by disabling those lines dint help either? i tried enabling configure CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ETHDEV_DEBUG=3Dy but still i don't see the log messages under /var/log nor on stdout? just to keep ball rolling i'd like to see at least kni compiling and working. FYI, i am using X540-AT2 cheers On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 10:09 AM, chintu hetam wrote= : > Thanks Xie. > > I am trying to test FreeBSD-9.3-virtio as guest. Somewhere in the forum i > found virtio-kni combination reaching around 2.7 Gbps performance, which = is > enough for my test, though i dint find equivalent driver performance > characterization for qemu-vhost user space combination. > Also, as per nics-2.2 user guide, "Linux kernel with KVM module; vhost > module loaded and ioeventfd supported. Qemu standard backend without vhos= t > support isn=E2=80=99t tested, and probably isn=E2=80=99t supported",which= is bit different > from vhost user space support,but still.. > > Just to be sure vhost user space =3D qemu virtio backend- tap-linux-bridg= e > configuration, as per nics guide, right? > > Thanking in advance, again. > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Xie, Huawei wrote= : > >> On 4/10/2016 7:26 AM, chintu hetam wrote: >> > I am compiling DPDK 2.2 on Fedora 23 and i am seeing following build >> error >> > >> /home/vcr/devel/dpdk/dpdk-2.2.0/build/build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/= kni_vhost.c: >> > In function =E2=80=98kni_sock_poll=E2=80=99: >> > >> /home/vcr/devel/dpdk/dpdk-2.2.0/build/build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/kni/= kni_vhost.c:254:25: >> > error: =E2=80=98SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE=E2=80=99 undeclared (first use in t= his function) >> > (!test_and_set_bit(SOCK_ASYNC_NOSPACE, &q->sock->flags) && >> > ^ >> >> Hi, besides the issue, now user space vhost is the preferred way to >> switch packets with the virtual machine, and we have plans to remove kni >> vhost support. Do you have any reason to use kni vhost? >> > >