From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl0-f65.google.com (mail-pl0-f65.google.com [209.85.160.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728BA271 for ; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 01:40:03 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-pl0-f65.google.com with SMTP id n13so5895167plp.11 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:40:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=gAkVPjQIwOT7tvlmMczdpe41NNghpwNrn63rS3y+q6o=; b=cCIszb12puRMZHSAep49dIkFumKK4w2NHxKBCXOVr4qHLICMWEoJ55L8zTx3yHEgVQ 3bCR1PQhs41N+6YByC96L5F0ZM5vut7hxU1WgnecascJ29TDsIF8ILtvNuhXso9jnAZJ MvP6AHUiXrTESDXGbxQs93Bur9wv8dAS4gvORLSJDqDBbjvOMa48IPhb9exEbuHaRZeI P8MNOscVBRCq5KZg+jJKCgSPp2PFvDF7oyTLbDqhsf3qPe+34HSffMgSb2dwg/3WmxO8 o71EqsBPmmvLk0QMhZeZpnczO+FIW+DRaxAVUA+ZFTxd583ESMKIpPMu7sZvP9y8AiZM FASw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=gAkVPjQIwOT7tvlmMczdpe41NNghpwNrn63rS3y+q6o=; b=KwF74+pO0bdIj3+aeiO6uYvJ4yfKDD2CZnZ6WB4uiaTYUnmaEkO+rKYwqFjHP0U2e4 1FwRTOaROybc90nOh6FGI6X/ovsfm9bfI0bPHnFEYYtYpVwcawiiFI6N94rKhf/3fZMp kACnvxnB45kdtm2jqPS8bCC9qtx9qZKtHiOID8eGx2qEMmSL5c03IaX2H/70E5Ac+RL6 2CR3Yw77OJ8pD/ScBesfL71Ng9e7P5ntRJiaOFRCGaoQarps7k97AW6bOXxjpeVMWMqj OxcMoh55AkLdoAxmLXNsalCUyp95SIkbkjElsSLSa/525HYnxsdDWqkSTwMTzZpKi3wU EiPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLV/r3LiHGjaucggWYmOkEdjr0FFh0iNszrQ9emRJnQ0KAPUDuf 6JhSkeSug2e0IzL9Ju1SIhj4/JGmP7weRYl1uaDEow== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotJmg+6dAS/hY0SnognMBV5LV1XrMJFxmK3S9z5QWzUXSfcPAUrQNH/GolYGE5tZkVmWFsENDhUpncwfCfOEb0= X-Received: by 10.84.143.131 with SMTP id 3mr1459290plz.113.1513644002556; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:40:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.167.81 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:40:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8750482.grKP3id3vm@xps> References: <20171124172132.GW4062@6wind.com> <20171218162443.12971-1-adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com> <20171218102304.66b2e98d@xeon-e3> <8750482.grKP3id3vm@xps> From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:40:01 -0800 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Adrien Mazarguil , Ferruh Yigit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/3] Introduce virtual PMD for Hyper-V/Azure platforms X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2017 00:40:03 -0000 On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 18/12/2017 19:23, Stephen Hemminger: > > Please don't call this drivers/net/hyperv/ > > that name conflicts with the real netvsc PMD that I am working on. > > > > Maybe vdev-netvsc? > > I expect your PMD to be in drivers/net/netvsc/ > Why is it conflicting with drivers/net/hyperv/ ? > > > > The naming is a bit confusing, and I am willing to change it since not upstream. The code uses mostly BSD driver which doesn't call itself netvsc. Instead the BSD driver uses hn_ as a prefix for most visible data and functions. Have been trying to name netvsc to avoid confusion with the kernel driver. Like any name it is completely irrelevant to functionality.