From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7B5A0C47; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 18:45:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10F9040E0F; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 18:45:09 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-io1-f54.google.com (mail-io1-f54.google.com [209.85.166.54]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 885A240689 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 18:45:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-io1-f54.google.com with SMTP id z206so3865795iof.0 for ; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 10:45:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p6/llz0YtwQE4efKrTszA4PNpmCGNJ0xV/9MsDSrGMU=; b=dzGtsYBN8fhnx8bSgOyoezytotGhUSQgNrQ1OsjbArroKEO7vZ+/RgAqxJy1pKYmNi K2gWd3o4q+2bj564QtlVMIRWZbh+fMvnBO2T3XFel4pvHF/7WfEKZi4ihyjsZ5jh8j+D 4eaO6KWQE+PfQqQkwPgoaBBD5mEaY8Vlu2Gnk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=p6/llz0YtwQE4efKrTszA4PNpmCGNJ0xV/9MsDSrGMU=; b=akTJs+uJpDzbTFxo2S1D7YajAs62sO0GtjxWgXexwcFCQ/JriCVBMrlXNU9MgtWkvs c/NNXaehM+9/2lqvO8AuzF9/bYwPh729iiAswb/dIjMVAPnT5WuZRsFVhYeu8DmZUECb qSVhx7uRTwzMQCcvXllc5ewgsFIlyCcqjeCakUq1QGNU+t5cz0SsKxAfTpgBtls40LAJ /U4FK468KORDcDBSctTDC9NtcnP1d0uWgT3Am6EYaeisMnfCxzgwRoBYNcgUR+1rFk6W xTxflUcv4FpgacVUlBJaDaDIKGJwLXs0Pr9zxIJvAniBK3mg/LR6rGcXVsoY/Q0JtIvB yMDg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532423Kn+h9fIgIMojUMsD+5Tcguvfm1hIf4bljUaFXWk3PqazTJ 3vGLbYpnAsrAtXb1T8/8URiM1U15EXccQYxLp7Y+asyuKrmruQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzRlPflT9EI+ZtHiEAxiSzjoGw2SfMOy+VQ/zQIy74Ir+3SnxJjh71kgt/3cPIZxlNTP8tT44sYW6s1J+6LD5g= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:8242:: with SMTP id n2mr31586771ioo.170.1635961506919; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 10:45:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Brandon Lo Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2021 13:44:31 -0400 Message-ID: To: marko.kovacevic@intel.com Cc: dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [dpdk-dev] Question Regarding FIPS Validation in DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hello, I have been able to use Cisco's libacvp tool to retrieve test vectors from the NIST ACVP API. However, after building the dpdk-fips_validation example and reading through its documentation, it seems like the example application is unable to parse the request files due to them being in a different format. Currently, the ACVP API will supply request files in json format. The example app documentation says that the request file must be in CAVS 21.0 format. I have not been able to find a specification for this format to compare. Does the current version of the dpdk-fips_validation example support the API's test vectors in json format? Thanks, Brandon -- Brandon Lo UNH InterOperability Laboratory 21 Madbury Rd, Suite 100, Durham, NH 03824 blo@iol.unh.edu www.iol.unh.edu