From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f46.google.com (mail-it0-f46.google.com [209.85.214.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7B2F8AA for ; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 10:18:00 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-it0-f46.google.com with SMTP id d9so38984106itc.0 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 01:18:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zr7wFCuMZqELlmaj+gADZj+1lA46VWSWGpE9bdQLDrQ=; b=nvAQ2pGSNwewxsdLWd3VN1l4mT5TfYqoZcveftE9Y7TAgpFaTH8lelluJeyiWmRDYm MHJ43znDgihXPclTjtgdYmcwtfgNyZdEf/CcwII7twNb7wZePMeAaTxdB2yaqOdi/nfl 1xe4hEyMmeh13A6TrL72vXMLUNIOm0Fkhe6onpyOxDhc4RhUUf+XeLK2nKdWUA5vffnk nNtOeIlvIeK0/WvzPQaddaokW2/7Pu/6AjjnMyTfjMdAoKes9p8IXz/uhqK3SLG0cX64 JWfznjZnK01SgR4UPTa6O8se3YBJMkb+JaAmW9ey4Vd6frlNUXYP3Wf7wDerhrOldBWQ DDCg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zr7wFCuMZqELlmaj+gADZj+1lA46VWSWGpE9bdQLDrQ=; b=dW44IkrqqyZw0/jrh6n74OkZF2e8QfKnoe9A8rADJFxbUA2awcqD3x9bRzYPJtuR3F fxHGCIytOh6PjNGAGd0DpoyxdQJ5dlQ/3WV0wHY7y3Wf+mGZUqXIw7/uzCafq278Wqkj wE8g9+hVrm/pqrDxilP2CqWkqiyi68JJ2gdZAC7oUxw4A6NGmNmZ2pIZhYRrMwcxAy0w Wyc91CVdtyyjPgWGekJgAg/DRoNMeAjAERws8KxXsVcpmBy13ZyvVFHQ9UWYtKBqpiEl cWjbEHl1XLX13D/HAQ/xpn6erFGJ9o421yRkgG270+SvRQ8dZLfmpv7szZuonL8GpmJa HT/w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIKlD7FqLHrFYv3tPwO4JKdO4Ym4Skf5+xhe0lnx8XSpkVuAW5A766CnibhK07yOQ== X-Received: by 10.36.121.75 with SMTP id z72mr20512576itc.94.1486631879387; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 01:17:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com (mail-io0-f178.google.com. [209.85.223.178]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z13sm12880294ioz.3.2017.02.09.01.17.58 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Feb 2017 01:17:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id j18so12084401ioe.2 for ; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 01:17:58 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.107.132.232 with SMTP id o101mr2335215ioi.4.1486631878489; Thu, 09 Feb 2017 01:17:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.180.143 with HTTP; Thu, 9 Feb 2017 01:17:58 -0800 (PST) From: Royce Niu Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:17:58 +0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: dev@dpdk.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] Can INTEL XL710-QDA2 achieve line rate for 64B pkt X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2017 09:18:00 -0000 Dear all, Is there anyone using Intel XL710-QDA2? Can it achieve 64B line rate in testpmd? How many cores can achieve the maximum throughput? Thanks. -- Regards, Royce