From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f41.google.com (mail-it0-f41.google.com [209.85.214.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 302509E3 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:36:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-it0-f41.google.com with SMTP id x188so8056186itb.0 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 02:36:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=semihalf-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=SbNhArQSgEnnbNgi/kKm8OuEzkfkdyrhq2y2UGwNU8o=; b=zqjSq0X6R6eLhiPsOZGKMM4Z2U1taJewDtTo7gfRYXMhI5E7+TUosr6B0GmTaaS9vi tEt5xgidR/AhIgPxtVSGkdXZNl368U5yeaBaOypIMQBZtOehXcjN6Evc4NEIUsVZwQzX k27/WUKROJZRwafLsqz1f3J7H+O1wxZ7RILNfoTspmmIVmuUUd99zzjNHSjrbdZx0MVp CQCD4RiDOKpGZCZljaSIluoc3F7IUtsOkeN281on4OMS1+HC1W+bFYKXZ4Mh+sxcjhFx fOIBCWYWhf1AosChWEgacZpTRP8Mdlhe9HAhCGy0UGIqS0acIHsJpTD8EUgjfzYUmNmp Rn4g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=SbNhArQSgEnnbNgi/kKm8OuEzkfkdyrhq2y2UGwNU8o=; b=MZv9PcUFGl6WZiDY2EliuzWCVqNNeYLzlIYOEXgJ2ahqW6zbb3El20BKgBzdgC9Wjx Y8LmWm21ZCk20bD1y9OgK7Q+S7qSxrm5Zn0UGqBTnBxewuHmneAEqobTGKzGNzMY0tro XbMkVvy9aYryjPFHjExwnsW3ZO3lW5KAFXXOxVcNSpgSUlVQZ6APDadKzPvQGP52b7jp 1zT3AgRx0WJP6Qi8I2hXFx3T8oxATyE1VU6v3rgPg8+nLsucPGBMmV6OzyuchlZ6RdFm izcPxNE7A5urCvSFO4jfIAMZwAETApyTuolk5OgU54Zq0Wh+7ZURoos0PBHJKtMM6vx6 RkpA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/5VnbgwVrIlS3u0p69jd7EY05koYv0Xhet7OZH6Hvub7vLAJBfC fp4FPJZCtjTqhWIZn5LigSN0/48gYA== X-Received: by 10.36.70.80 with SMTP id j77mr267831itb.20.1493285760444; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 02:36:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.6.212 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 02:35:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1982394.bHk3uHp29x@xps13> References: <2016122121181642100644@raisecom.com> <2017011619162170012425@raisecom.com> <1982394.bHk3uHp29x@xps13> From: Andriy Berestovskyy Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 11:35:39 +0200 Message-ID: To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: Maple , DPDK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-maintainers] Example(Load_balancer) Tx Flush Bug(This bug DPDK each version) X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:36:01 -0000 Hey, Those patches superseded by: http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-April/064858.html Regards, Andriy On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry if you feel your patch is ignored. > It is not in the right format for several reasons we tried > to explain earlier I think. > Please read carefully this doc: > http://dpdk.org/doc/guides/contributing/patches.html > > > 2017-01-16 19:16, Maple: >> From: Maple >> To: ; >> Cc: >> Subject: [PATCH] Load_balancer Tx Flush Bug >> Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2017 19:15:48 +0800 >> Message-Id: <1482371868-19669-1-git-send-email-liujian@raisecom.com> >> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 >> In-Reply-To: <2016122122394164225248@raisecom.com> >> References: <2016122122394164225248@raisecom.com> >> >> We found a bug in use load_balancer example,and,This bug DPDK each version. >> In IO tx flush, only flush port 0. >> So,If I enable more than the Port,then,In addition to 0 port won't flush. >> >> Signed-off-by: Maple >> --- >> a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c | 667 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c | 669 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 2 files changed, 1336 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c >> create mode 100644 b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c >> >> diff --git a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c >> index 9612392..3a2e900 100644 >> --- a/test/a/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c >> +++ b/test/b/examples/load_balancer/runtime.c >> @@ -418,9 +418,11 @@ app_lcore_io_tx( >> static inline void >> app_lcore_io_tx_flush(struct app_lcore_params_io *lp) >> { >> + uint8_t i; >> uint8_t port; >> >> - for (port = 0; port < lp->tx.n_nic_ports; port ++) { >> + port = lp->tx.nic_ports[0]; >> + for (i = 0; i < lp->tx.n_nic_ports; i ++) { >> uint32_t n_pkts; >> >> if (likely((lp->tx.mbuf_out_flush[port] == 0) || >> > > -- Andriy Berestovskyy