From: Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Ashwin Sekhar T K <ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.com>,
byron.marohn@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com,
dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] efd: support lookup using neon intrinsics
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 15:59:30 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP4Qi3-+S5z8ORavtM-TRE1NZ+g2yxtvcH9aR-L__e=pSBs9TQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170502064059.GA28685@jerin>
On 2 May 2017 at 14:41, Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
>> Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 22:59:53 -0700
>> From: Ashwin Sekhar T K <ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.com>
>> To: byron.marohn@intel.com, pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com,
>> jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, jianbo.liu@linaro.org
>> Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ashwin Sekhar T K <ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.com>
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] efd: support lookup using neon intrinsics
>> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.13.0.rc1
>>
>> * Added file lib/librte_efd/rte_efd_arm64.h to hold arm64
>> specific definitions
>> * Verified the changes with efd_autotest unit test case
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ashwin Sekhar T K <ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> * Slightly modified the content of the commit message body
>> * Added prefix [dpdk-dev] to the email subject line
>>
>> v3:
>> * Moved enum 'EFD_LOOKUP_NEON' under '#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)'
>>
>> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
>> lib/librte_efd/rte_efd.c | 24 +++++++++++++
>> lib/librte_efd/rte_efd_arm64.h | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 lib/librte_efd/rte_efd_arm64.h
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index b6495d2..7d708ae 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ F: lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/*_64.h
>> F: lib/librte_acl/acl_run_neon.*
>> F: lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h
>> F: lib/librte_hash/rte*_arm64.h
>> +F: lib/librte_efd/rte*_arm64.h
>> F: drivers/net/ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx_vec_neon.c
>> F: drivers/net/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c
>> F: drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_simple_neon.c
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_efd/rte_efd.c b/lib/librte_efd/rte_efd.c
>> index f601d62..5cc6283 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_efd/rte_efd.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_efd/rte_efd.c
>> @@ -53,6 +53,8 @@
>> #include "rte_efd.h"
>> #if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86)
>> #include "rte_efd_x86.h"
>> +#elif defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
>> +#include "rte_efd_arm64.h"
>> #endif
>>
>> #define EFD_KEY(key_idx, table) (table->keys + ((key_idx) * table->key_len))
>> @@ -103,6 +105,9 @@ allocated memory
>> enum efd_lookup_internal_function {
>> EFD_LOOKUP_SCALAR = 0,
>> EFD_LOOKUP_AVX2,
>> +#if defined(RTE_ARCH_ARM64)
>> + EFD_LOOKUP_NEON,
>> +#endif
>
> I think, we can remove this ifdef to
> - Make code looks clean
> - In future, in some case a new enum value gets added then the value
> will be different for each build.
>
But the enum items are same for each ARCH.
Besides, the ifdef could be considered as explanation to that enum. If
someone knows nothing about arm/neon, he can ignore it totally after
see the ifdef.
> Any valid point to keep under RTE_ARCH_ARM64?
>
>> EFD_LOOKUP_NUM
>> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-02 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-27 11:42 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-04-27 12:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-04-28 10:06 ` Jianbo Liu
2017-04-28 10:38 ` Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-05-02 1:56 ` Jianbo Liu
2017-07-03 13:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-05-02 5:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Ashwin Sekhar T K
2017-05-02 6:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-05-02 7:59 ` Jianbo Liu [this message]
2017-05-02 8:04 ` Sekhar, Ashwin
2017-06-29 20:58 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAP4Qi3-+S5z8ORavtM-TRE1NZ+g2yxtvcH9aR-L__e=pSBs9TQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=jianbo.liu@linaro.org \
--cc=ashwin.sekhar@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=byron.marohn@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).