From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
Received: from mail-yw0-f169.google.com (mail-yw0-f169.google.com
 [209.85.161.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6FA37B1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 26 Sep 2016 07:40:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-yw0-f169.google.com with SMTP id i129so151328200ywb.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=aLdiV4THeYdgQz0ZKmEjE6p4u1Z53YJrKOgt1jtjbLc=;
 b=hVaLnydFE74ZJn/E/Esl8G7R0oOVQ4S7tVZc076B1yAF6KYANntA37OTcK3p8xMQ2O
 yzcPprL6bI7qJ9dSXH/yaCB0/wlLkhH1VQzaIzEYtCCWhl1cwBMkpVp3r/F9OxIOAqeo
 swwYO/hNQiL4x0kJ4carHoSsS1oVBpYx/KjeY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=aLdiV4THeYdgQz0ZKmEjE6p4u1Z53YJrKOgt1jtjbLc=;
 b=DEhPVrWb+A6hLRtx4m19ADenmwcD6nIBYfvM4oo9mjL1Ql78xSEU82xfxcLXMv8MQu
 qqNE1GjSyinEfLbeNy2FGHb51Pow68Dwin3k+3chLhI+h1wLK+u005aubuOkjPz7h5rd
 EGXDFDepKC9BAhEF8ZDQVxmpNaPdXVweu9dJKSwUZewgjaILmvx4O4JqjCE6kl011f8t
 OmKA930gmUtvES7fGl15Y49sL8K2JLdJ1CksFFcc4G9mIWuq0lSxGAe3KhRFIwY8+ujY
 dACSofyVXqot+ak2UEOFWKBF29ke4GH9Rf7p5f65oL3judBip4W6b5K7h7GeBHzVBSA6
 oWOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNxuc1T6ULYpxIC3NEZ5pRxy3h0rEv9CF5YKCeeTYoNoN4rwFE/TMZPRnAWeVrmUmqKmvJWVPkjts2YQ/qw
X-Received: by 10.13.223.22 with SMTP id i22mr17753263ywe.32.1474868451433;
 Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:40:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.25.6 with HTTP; Sun, 25 Sep 2016 22:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAA2XHbfh3idNS_srWuTG6ipeN8SXrtsov1t5CZtqZ72LQLKoeA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1471319402-112998-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <1471585430-125925-1-git-send-email-zhihong.wang@intel.com>
 <e6addeba-ffbc-baae-61c8-5b8e798c843e@redhat.com>
 <CAP4Qi3-cSgHDPC3Wne3RSL0t=Z-vhYUPsPWH6VAXsXsHYX6ShQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09414E7B5581@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CAP4Qi39-KD8pY-3M31asoDV+dja27XzFTsBMq9ignoawdL8=HQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160922022903.GJ23158@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <CAP4Qi392=aOMrSyTu-5qwpSLpwK-NVdHp-aztT-xT=BcRPWoew@mail.gmail.com>
 <8F6C2BD409508844A0EFC19955BE09414E7B5DAE@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
 <CAP4Qi39YF6SoaiSaka0ioZFWb-2uzWZUbNP4CK7LqCQosaSmWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA2XHbfh3idNS_srWuTG6ipeN8SXrtsov1t5CZtqZ72LQLKoeA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 13:40:50 +0800
Message-ID: <CAP4Qi39-qJ3xgJt0a5-wmN+9Ymi=kGMHNEhOgFz2WHh2GuwanA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Luke Gorrie <luke@snabb.co>
Cc: "Wang, Zhihong" <zhihong.wang@intel.com>,
 Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>, 
 Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] vhost: optimize enqueue
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2016 05:40:52 -0000

On 26 September 2016 at 13:37, Luke Gorrie <luke@snabb.co> wrote:
> On 22 September 2016 at 11:01, Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@linaro.org> wrote:
>>
>> Tested with testpmd, host: txonly, guest: rxonly
>> size (bytes)     improvement (%)
>> 64                    4.12
>> 128                   6
>> 256                   2.65
>> 512                   -1.12
>> 1024                 -7.02
>
>
> Have you considered testing with more diverse workloads e.g. mixed packet
> sizes that are not always multiples of the cache line & register sizes?
>
No. Does testpmd can stress performance with mixed size?