From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8208A054C; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:15:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8611DB9; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:15:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qk1-f176.google.com (mail-qk1-f176.google.com [209.85.222.176]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B687DE3; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:06:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qk1-f176.google.com with SMTP id h4so8955631qkm.0; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 04:06:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/Gu/wmZZwKZPLhXl5UdGPQ17rX/tyQoEg4Dz8UGmr6M=; b=KRVLxtZhoKKnBbgVO9VlPR68OpTrq1/Bhry0WRZpc0Iv5z21Jnlj4E6PdPULRqWs5I NISQKnBiqBHw6c4Cy9R2qAwurd3krJMbLWqpQBk/P98+RH3irlq8Mf9KTtCLX2Yn1KTI vDHB0esrmIKEEAayz9pNbZ/MWNWKefeW8MOgGESwNEl9ODDlouV6UHbLboz8bJTCNO9J 3zjQ0gYQun5p936UVl7XbEKVg1lA1l0H6uTNZAXc8shbPm2DJ8I2TDoSuBlX8RtBpTz6 04ewFbFg4Issz2ceTfak3T9Ux1WYqWeZA2Alh0ocervhg5eoRhau+A0uzFHx7on31o9r tdIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/Gu/wmZZwKZPLhXl5UdGPQ17rX/tyQoEg4Dz8UGmr6M=; b=L2rqH6ACJUhh/aH47/RkZ059Rx3oY0Qo+cH0QX/+oQYz3gRZg+N51iTFa3T/SZYjnf HOuDoiI/BQJlgFMa2MoqxCXxZfG9AkWKzKxX/k3wuJ7OX+UxuDkfWK87HvBLYLLy/FHG HBIh8Ga7w2irumlIGivuDDnA29FaZ+5bpiSSS9cfz/1CgZUCXLQqiWV1JuxhPpe5t+yS TcbbDL2HKMY+9/6BXGaISq/6ijw/gs+IHT4ZOaej0FzINNIeBgoxxYrwsNv9Z6OBjIlU VZr2vqU/AizjdL1HBb4twEpLsu80ON7B8qv12NfVjQUkDGgCcE9rqVXwiTnAhoJItB20 vyig== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV/cgG2UovpuL6luJA9uNc83RO6r8+tz6R/I67M1Waqt7CnJC4v sV1IFAzkiW7pNtQu9GIJ2ysUTOcFm0NVDhZVwEPE8PmP X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyHBJdwFgGrouS6q3WLnnCmDOXsYCQA914EagKDnn4Qr7Opo7pozQC+bvjh7unikV++Ko3iU2/w+4CusdPrKuI= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a7c2:: with SMTP id q185mr2022400qke.97.1581681965432; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 04:06:05 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Soumen Chandra Laha Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 17:35:53 +0530 Message-ID: To: users , users@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 19:15:02 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Subject: [dpdk-dev] L3fwd-power queue utilization issue X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, I'm trying to run l3fwd-power application for 2 Port with queue. Always only queue 1 of port 0 and port 1 are utilized. CPU C-state, hpet are enabled, ports are binded to igb_uio. Tried with NIC's x772 (10 GbE) and XXV710(25 GbE), Observed same behavior. I am observing the below output: */root/comms/dpdk/examples/l3fwd-power/build/l3fwd-power -l 2,3,4,5 -n 6 --socket-mem 512,0 -w 17:00.0 -w 17:00.1 -- -p 0x3 --config '(0,0,2),(0,1,3),(1,0,4),(1,1,5)' -P* EAL: Detected 48 lcore(s) EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/l3fwd/mp_socket EAL: Probing VFIO support... EAL: PCI device 0000:17:00.0 on NUMA socket 0 EAL: probe driver: 8086:158b net_i40e EAL: PCI device 0000:17:00.1 on NUMA socket 0 EAL: probe driver: 8086:158b net_i40e Promiscuous mode selected POWER: Attempting to initialise ACPI cpufreq power management... POWER: Power management governor of lcore 2 has been set to user space successfully POWER: Initialized successfully for lcore 2 power management POWER: Power management governor of lcore 3 has been set to user space successfully POWER: Initialized successfully for lcore 3 power management POWER: Power management governor of lcore 4 has been set to user space successfully POWER: Initialized successfully for lcore 4 power management POWER: Power management governor of lcore 5 has been set to user space successfully POWER: Initialized successfully for lcore 5 power management Initializing port 0 ... Creating queues: nb_rxq=2 nb_txq=4... Port 0 modified RSS hash function based on hardware support,requested:0x20820 configured:0x820 Address:00:E0:ED:96:2B:AA, Allocated mbuf pool on socket 0 Initializing rx queues on lcore 2 ... rxq=0,0,0 Initializing rx queues on lcore 3 ... rxq=0,1,0 Initializing rx queues on lcore 4 ... rxq=1,0,0 Initializing rx queues on lcore 5 ... rxq=1,1,0 Checking link status.....done Port 0 Link Up - speed 25000 Mbps - full-duplex Port 1 Link Up - speed 25000 Mbps - full-duplex L3FWD_POWER: entering main loop on lcore 3 L3FWD_POWER: -- lcoreid=3 portid=0 rxqueueid=1 L3FWD_POWER: entering main loop on lcore 4 L3FWD_POWER: -- lcoreid=4 portid=1 rxqueueid=0 L3FWD_POWER: entering main loop on lcore 5 L3FWD_POWER: -- lcoreid=5 portid=1 rxqueueid=1 EAL: Event already been added. L3FWD_POWER: entering main loop on lcore 2 L3FWD_POWER: -- lcoreid=2 portid=0 rxqueueid=0 EAL: Event already been added. L3FWD_POWER: lcore 3 sleeps until interrupt triggers L3FWD_POWER: lcore 4 sleeps until interrupt triggers L3FWD_POWER: lcore 5 sleeps until interrupt triggers L3FWD_POWER: lcore 2 sleeps until interrupt triggers L3FWD_POWER: lcore 3 is waked up from rx interrupt on port 0 queue 1 L3FWD_POWER: lcore 3 sleeps until interrupt triggers L3FWD_POWER: lcore 5 is waked up from rx interrupt on port 1 queue 1 L3FWD_POWER: lcore 5 sleeps until interrupt triggers I would appreciate it if some expert can shade a light on this. Thanks & Regards, Soumen