From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f171.google.com (mail-wi0-f171.google.com [209.85.212.171]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABFC8D9E for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:26:45 +0100 (CET) Received: by wicll6 with SMTP id ll6so51144030wic.0 for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 06:26:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=exouYiXErqH2BwzRJ/3NdUPAbn0lY3NSYL84dbapFq0=; b=y4ZGKOkIR+oEDd8p1yq8vpHCPN/5G3qa3BkhlNL9hOblFk8niMfhf7lJaKxQhixdjA /pHoz2AjC8YL5l7ARKBJKYfaEoPopoRmiDgvjUUPFJrXjKte4aqRX6NwCwb6PCU2Fz55 F3YKdjZRk+FmT+SyaMW3EDlD+mOag23Qe1FqQsqao4vlum0+bFUrsImrDS6lSV4Blt6C Ni6Md3xtuW5Xyxp0UPlWwY5HJttIir34/AilMsIQfrNxT+rg59qMdwGdcfZdVD2lM3r6 pvTSrcdW6K2FqXFshjnUh/mJ48VWZiTnIJtlTOvVwI7oDowfFkuXNgLmzIvkj8v4vXZp SulA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.184.7 with SMTP id eq7mr23642601wjc.26.1446474404896; Mon, 02 Nov 2015 06:26:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.95.198 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Nov 2015 06:26:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3635307.scPkXzVTSB@xps13> References: <1434702301-4509-1-git-send-email-vido@cesnet.cz> <2385499.t56VK4bXHN@xps13> <3635307.scPkXzVTSB@xps13> Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:26:44 +0100 Message-ID: From: Matej Vido To: Thomas Monjalon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15 Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] doc: add documentation for szedata2 PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:26:45 -0000 Hi Thomas, 2015-10-27 19:00 GMT+01:00 Thomas Monjalon : > 2015-10-27 18:33, Matej Vido: > > 2015-10-26 16:09 GMT+01:00 Thomas Monjalon : > > > SZEDATA2 is not a vdev. Is it possible to probe it as a standard PCI > > > device? > > > > > It would be possible to probe it as a standard PCI device, but as this > > szedata2 driver uses libsze2 library it needs to pass some parameters to > > the library and we thought that using vdev would be the easiest solution. > > Is there a way how to provide parameters to pdev driver? > > No, but it could be added by working on unifying pdev and vdev. > > > We also work on a new PMD which will eliminate dependencies on kernel > > modules and libsze2, and using this PMD COMBO card will be probed as a > > standard PCI device. > > I think it's better to wait for your new implementation. > It would be nice to have it in the release 2.2. > Do you think it could be submitted in the coming weeks? > We will not manage to submit the new driver implementation in the release 2.2. Any chance to get this virtual driver into 2.2? Matej Vido